1 posted on
10/08/2003 10:26:51 PM PDT by
Shermy
To: Shermy
Typical Democrat...oops, I'm caught.
2 posted on
10/08/2003 10:27:45 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(I DONATED! HAVE YOU? DONATE NOW OR I'LL HAVE YOU TAKEN OFF THE DO NOT CALL LIST)
To: Shermy
Sure, but does he still own the cap from Ratko Mladic?
3 posted on
10/08/2003 10:28:11 PM PDT by
Chummy
To: All
Hi mom!
4 posted on
10/08/2003 10:30:13 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: mewzilla; okie01; HAL9000; Peach; Mo1; Destro; wirestripper; dighton
Spell said Clark was answering hypothetical questions when he said he probably would have voted for the resolution, but he is clearly an opponent of the war. I'm glad that's cleared up.
"Anyone who's seen General Clark on television the last year or has read his book knows where he stands on the war," she said. "It's unfortunate that Senator Lieberman is choosing to ignore all that and focusing on one day's news story."
Oh, now I understand. Message: it only matters what he says in his scripted book and television photo-ops.
5 posted on
10/08/2003 10:30:31 PM PDT by
Shermy
(Proud Mary keep on burnin')
To: Shermy
Gosh, it's so good to hear that Fabiani said it's appropriate. I'm convinced, just like this AP writer [/sarc].
6 posted on
10/08/2003 10:32:31 PM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: Shermy
Guess he's sticking to that "Money back if not delighted" pledge.
To: Shermy
Too late. Ashley Wilkes can't even campaign (for three weeks) within the rules, and he has the audacity to suggest that he should be President. He can't campaign competently or lawfully, but he is the one to fix Iraq? The Rats are in trouble.
10 posted on
10/08/2003 10:35:28 PM PDT by
faithincowboys
(Defeat the Fifth Column Leftist Bastards)
To: Shermy
He should stand his gound and go to jail, imagine the publicity!
17 posted on
10/08/2003 11:18:32 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Please visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
Bank robber returns money, all is forgiven........how nice for his kind...........
20 posted on
10/09/2003 12:35:47 AM PDT by
Squantos
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: Shermy
Wesley Clark Will Return Payments From Speeches He should instead keep the money and be required to put out a truthful retraction of his political self-promotion.
"As required by law, I must admit that I am a retired perfumed prince, a political hack general, owned by the Clintons, whose idea of honorable warfare is to bomb civilian targets from 15,000 feet in order to demoralize the populace. Thank you very much, that will be $30,000."
22 posted on
10/09/2003 5:12:47 AM PDT by
ctonious
To: Shermy
No harm done, just return the money. Think it will work for Hillary, too? (sarcasm)
23 posted on
10/09/2003 5:15:06 AM PDT by
Pan_Yans Wife
("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
To: Shermy
Wesley Clark's ripples in the pool of American history are already becoming indistinct.
He's a pebble that didn't skip and is now taking a one way trip to the bottom of the pool.
To: Shermy
Actually, Weaselely Clark will get into his DeLorean Time Machine and go back into time and refuse those payments.
Of course since he is not a registered demonicRat, the law doesn't apply to him as an independent pretending to be a rat candidate.
26 posted on
10/09/2003 6:51:34 AM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Fight Liberalism 24/7/365 for only 17 cents / day. Donate $5 monthly to Free Republic.)
To: Shermy
Hillary! spanked General Smurf's hand.
27 posted on
10/09/2003 6:52:26 AM PDT by
mhking
(When it rains it pours: I'm looking for a job again -- any offers or help: mhking@bellsouth.net)
To: Shermy
...said Biersack, who added that the commission hasn't been asked to review the matter...
...because Clark is not a Republican.
29 posted on
10/09/2003 8:22:16 AM PDT by
Choose Ye This Day
(Moving to Turkmenistan, where all the jobs are.)
To: Shermy
If you stab someone, just because you remove the knife doesn't mean you are innocent of the crime.
The same is true for Clark's (and democRAT's and Liberal's in general) continual violation of campaign finance laws. Just because they return the money does not mean they did not commit a crime.
Why are there no prosecutions?
It appears that, just like with gun control laws, the Left intends to pass more and more laws, not enforce them, continue to cite evils 'caused' by campaign financing, and then finally claim that 'Restrictions did not work. We must ban all campaign contributions from individuals. The only real fix is total Federal control of campaigns."
30 posted on
10/09/2003 10:08:01 AM PDT by
jimkress
(Go away Pat Go away!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson