[Mr. Silverback]

McClintock could have won had the Repuclican party stood toe to toe with this man. He wasn't a winnable candidate because the GOP failed him.

I beleive Mcclintock should have had strong support from day one, but once it became apparent he couldn't win the question became who to vote for that had a chance to win.

Politics is war by other means, the vote is your weapon. If you're firing off your weapon in a way that aids the enemy, it doesn't matter how good your intentions are.

The Catholic Church teaches us now to vote for the lesser of two evils.

Abortion wasn't the only issue though, was it? In the California race there were two candidates who had a chance to win. One of them was willing to risk driver's licenses falling into Al-Qaida hands in order to gain a few votes. The other was opposed to that risk. McClintock voters went home with a warm fuzzy feeling because they chose not to help the second guy.

[Prolifeconservative]

You have said there were two candidates that could win.


Says who? That's flat out wrong. There were three candidates that could win. And to say McClintock had no shot at winning is capitulation to your conservitive ideas. McClintock had a chance to win, but the GOP sold him down the river. You totally missed my point.

The GOP is getting real slick at manufacturing a victory with their money and power.

Please show me where the the Republican party got behind the candidacy of McClintock.

[Prolifeconservative]

"McClintock voters went home with a warm fuzzy feeling because they chose not to help the second guy."

The warm fuzzy feeling in your above quote will be the same feeling I have on judgement day when I have to stand before God Almighty and give an account of my life.

Woe to the individual who must somehow defend his vote before Almighty God on judgement day for casting a vote for a candidate who supported the destruction and mutilation of God's beautiful and innocent creatures.