Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aurelius
"The same "emancipation" of the property of the vanquished that occurs in all wars."

Which is exactly whay Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation called for. Why do you people continue to insist that Lincoln's EP freed no slaves when even in mid 1864, the President of the CSA admitted that half of the slaves in the south had already been freed by it?

33 posted on 10/10/2003 6:35:11 AM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
What was done would have been done with or without the proclamation. The proclamation was devised solely for political purposes. So far as I know, no serious historian disputes that or maintains that any slaves were actually freed as a result of the proclamation.
34 posted on 10/10/2003 6:45:26 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson