Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ditto
What was done would have been done with or without the proclamation. The proclamation was devised solely for political purposes. So far as I know, no serious historian disputes that or maintains that any slaves were actually freed as a result of the proclamation.
34 posted on 10/10/2003 6:45:26 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Aurelius
bump for bookmark
35 posted on 10/10/2003 7:17:51 AM PDT by carton253 (All I need to know about Islam I learned on 9/11/2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Aurelius
"What was done would have been done with or without the proclamation."

Not true at all. Before the EP, slaves were taken as "contraband" or accepted as refugees if they could get to Union lines, but if the owners could get into court the courts would order the "property" returned if owner could demonstrate that the slaves were not providing direct support for the revolution. Without the EP, at the end of the war, owners would be able under the law to reclaim their property. The EP changed that and designated any slave residing in rebelious territory as being automatically a material aid to the enemy and declared them free for all time.

Yes, the EP was a political statement, and a powerful one, but it also had significant real results in permantly freeing millions of slaves.

36 posted on 10/10/2003 7:27:57 AM PDT by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson