Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Aqsa Mosque, Dome of Rock Built to Divert Pilgrimage from Mecca, Jerusalem Not Center of Worship
MEMRI ^ | 10-8-03 | Ahmad Muhammad 'Arafa

Posted on 10/08/2003 11:29:00 AM PDT by SJackson


THE MIDDLE EAST MEDIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Special Dispatch Series - No. 583
October 3, 2003 No.583
Egyptian Ministry of Culture Publication: The Al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock were Built to Divert the Pilgrimage from Mecca; Jerusalem was Not the Center of Worship for the Followers of the Prophet Muhammad

On August 5, 2003 Ahmad Muhammad 'Arafa, a columnist for the Egyptian weekly Al-Qahira, which is published by the Egyptian Ministry of Culture, wrote an article rejecting the established Islamic doctrine that the Prophet Muhammad's celebrated "Night Journey" (Koran 17:1) took him from Mecca to Jerusalem. 'Arafa, presenting a new analysis of the Koranic text, asserts that the Night Journey in Surat Al-Isra' (that is, "the Sura of the Night Journey") in the Koran does not refer to a miraculous journey from Mecca to Jerusalem, but to the Prophet's emigration (Hijra) from Mecca to Medina . [1]

Two weeks later, 'Arafa published another article [2] in the same weekly questioning the sanctity of Jerusalem in Islam. The following are excerpts from this article:


The Change in 'Qibla' Means Jerusalem Lost its Former Priority in Islam

"…Palestine was conquered [by the Muslims] in the year 17 A.H. [638 A. D.] in the time of 'Umar Ibn Al-Khattab, and in his day, the people [of Palestine] were beginning to adopt Islam. Hence, how could there have existed in Palestine, at the time of the Prophet [i.e. before Palestine was conquered by Islam], a mosque, be it called 'the most distant' [Arabic: al-aqsa] or not…

"Therefore, the mosque known today as the Al-Aqsa Mosque is not the one referred to by the Koranic words: 'From the Al-Haram Mosque [in Mecca] to the most distant mosque (al-aqsa).' It is true that the Prophet did direct himself in prayer, according to Allah's instructions, toward Iliya [i. e., Aelia] – the name of Jerusalem in that period – for 17 months, and then, instructed by Allah, he redirected himself to the Al-Haram Mosque in Mecca. Aelia was the center of worship for the Jews, as it continues to be. This means that, for a while, the Prophet shared with them their direction of prayer (qibla), and then he turned away from it toward another qibla

"The change of qibla from Jerusalem to the Al-Haram Mosque [in Mecca] meant that Jerusalem was no longer the center of worship for the followers of Muhammad and that it no longer deserved to be respected by Muslims beyond what any historical city in their domain deserved. If this is not understood in this way [namely, that the change of qibla signifies that Jerusalem lost its previous religious status], then the change of qibla has no meaning…"

The Al-Aqsa Mosque was Built and Promoted in the Context of Political Rivalry

"When 'Abd Al-Malik Ibn Marwan became caliph and [his rival] Ibn Al-Zubayr held control of Hijaz, he [Caliph 'Abd Al-Malik] feared that the people would be inclined towards him [Ibn Al-Zubayr] when they made pilgrimage [to Mecca], because the only way they could enter Mecca and Medina was with Ibn Al-Zubayr's permission and under his control. And if he [Ibn Al-Zubayr] received them hospitably… then he would win the allegiance of many of them…. Therefore, 'Abd Al-Malik prevented people from making pilgrimage until [Ibn Al-Zubayr was defeated and] the war ended. He [Abd Al-Malik] began to build a large mosque in Jerusalem, which had been the first qibla. It is from this point in time that some transmitters of traditions started to promote the religious significance of this mosque and turn it into the 'third to the two holy mosques [of Mecca and Medina]' [3] ….

"The new mosque [in Jerusalem] was first called 'the Mosque of Aelia,' and prophetic traditions were invented mentioning this name [so as to invest it with Islamic significance]. Then the name 'Al-Aqsa' was stolen for it [from the mosque in Medina], because it [i.e. the mosque of Aelia] was the most distant from Mecca and Medina. It was claimed that the Koranic expression 'the most distant mosque' referred to it [i.e. the mosque of Aelia] because the mosque of the Prophet [in Medina] was neither 'distant' nor 'most distant' for the people of Medina… [4]

"In sum, the mosque of Jerusalem, known as the Al-Aqsa Mosque, began to be built in the year 66 A.H. at the time of 'Abd Al-Malik Ibn Marwan, and construction was completed in the year 73 A. H. The religious connection of Muslims to Jerusalem ended with the change of the qibla from Jerusalem to Mecca. When 'Abd Al-Malik Ibn Marwan prevented the people of Syria and Iraq from performing pilgrimage for a number of years, so they should not be inclined towards Ibn Al-Zubayr, and began to build a large mosque in Aelia, religious traditions appeared glorifying this mosque and the Dome of the Rock. And it was called at first the Mosque of Aelia, and then the name of the mosque Al-Aqsa was stolen for it from the mosque of Medina. And what facilitated this [transfer of the name 'Al-Aqsa'] is that the people of Medina did not call [their mosque] 'distant' or 'most distant,' because it is a geographical term [which was not relevant to them]…. We inherited these [traditions promoting the sanctity of Jerusalem] as if they were part of [the Islamic] religion."



[1] For the previous article by 'Arafa, see MEMRI Special Dispatch No.564

[2] Al-Qahira (Egypt), August 19, 2003.

[3] The author is repeating a particular theory, expounded by I. Goldziher in 1890 (See Muhammedanische Studien, II, pp. 35-37; English translation: Muslim Studies II, pp. 44-45), that in building the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque 'Abd al-Malik was motivated by his desire to divert the Pilgrimage from Mecca to Jerusalem, as part of his campaign against Ibn al-Zubayr. This theory, which had been widely accepted, found its way into textbooks on Islamic history. It should, however, be noted that this theory was reexamined and refuted by S. D. Goitein (see "The Sanctity of Jerusalem and Palestine in Early Islam," in his Studies in Islamic History and Institutions, Leiden, 1966, pp. 135-137) and is no longer accepted in modern scholarship.

'Arafa begins this article with a quotation from Al-Uns al-jalil bi-ta'rikh al-quds wa'l-khalil, by Mujir al-Din 'Abd al-Rahman al-'Ulaymi al-Hanbali al-Maqdisi (810/1456-928/1522), stating that the Ummayad Caliph 'Abd Al-Malik Ibn Marwan decided to build the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to divert the pilgrimage away from Mecca – at that time controlled by his rival Ibn al-Zubayr – to Jerusalem, which was under his control and close to Damascus, his own capital. 'Arafa notes that he borrowed this quotation from an article by Ahmad 'Uthman on the dispute over Jerusalem's holy sites 'Awda ila 'l-khilaf 'ala muqaddasat al-aqsa, al-ha'it wa'l-masjid, published in Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, November 19, 2000.

[4] The author explains that once the name Al-Aqsa was appropriated for the mosque in Jerusalem, this new name was incorporated into the various traditions that were disseminated in order to promote the Islamic significance of Jerusalem.


 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alaksa; alaqsa; domeoftherock; godsgravesglyphs; jerusalem; templemount

1 posted on 10/08/2003 11:29:01 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

Jerusalem was Not the Center of Worship for the Followers of the Prophet Muhammad

Oops, left his talking points at home I guess. They always took good care of the place.


2 posted on 10/08/2003 11:40:24 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


How we have, and can, change the world


History of Free Republic


Click The Logo to Donate
Click The Logo To Donate


3 posted on 10/08/2003 11:40:54 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This picture is of Jewds praying at the Kotel:


4 posted on 10/08/2003 11:42:35 AM PDT by Alouette (Neocon Zionist Media Operative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Jewds

Sorry, Jews (or "Jewish dudes")

5 posted on 10/08/2003 11:43:15 AM PDT by Alouette (Neocon Zionist Media Operative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Oops, forgot the captions. The other pics, of course, display the high regard and ongoing maintainance given to these sites prior to the realization of their political worth.
6 posted on 10/08/2003 11:48:42 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Jerusalem's importance to Islam has more to do with eighth century C.E. Umayyad politics than anything else. The Koran never mentions Jerusalem and recognizes the Jewish claim to Israel as promised by G-d.

Here is a piece you might find interesting from Binyamin Netanyahu's website:

Jerusalem in the Koran?

Jim Brown 7 Feb 2003


Shortly before the death [in May 2001] of Feisal Husseini, who was appointed by Arafat to be responsible for Jerusalem affairs, Husseini and Jewish Leadership founder Moshe Feiglin held a debate in the Tzavta Club in Jerusalem. The debate was held under the auspices of a left-wing organization, and was attended by foreign reporters. The moderator attempted to have Feiglin and Husseini shake hands, but Feiglin refused, saying that he does not shake hands with people who wish to destroy him. "This of course lost Feiglin some points amidst the mostly left-wing crowd," reports Segal.

When Feiglin's turn to speak came, he pulled out a Koran and asked Husseini, "Is this your holy book?" When Husseini said yes, Feiglin pulled out a Tanach (Bible) and said, "And you agree that this is my holy book, correct?" After that point was agreed as well, Feiglin said, "In my holy book, Jerusalem is mentioned hundreds of times by name, and additional hundreds in other references," and he gave several examples from various verses. After this point was also agreed upon, Feiglin said, "Now you show me one place where Jerusalem is mentioned in your holy book!" Husseini almost "swallowed his tongue," Segal reports, and after a few uncomfortable seconds of silence, a loud wave of applause swept the room.

"Although it was clear that the debate had ended," Segal concluded his story, "the moderator asked another question or two in order to soften the impression, but it was clear the Moshe had won with a total knock-out. A few days later, Husseini set off for the Persian Gulf, where he died of a heart attack."


7 posted on 10/08/2003 12:23:56 PM PDT by anotherview ("Ignorance is the choice not to know" -Klaus Schulze)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
Great story!!
8 posted on 10/08/2003 12:29:39 PM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
In my holy book, Jerusalem is mentioned hundreds of times by name, and additional hundreds in other references," and he gave several examples from various verses. After this point was also agreed upon, Feiglin said, "Now you show me one place where Jerusalem is mentioned in your holy book!"

A simple electronic Koran search at the Univ of Mich.

Hebron-0 hits

Hevron-0 hits

Jericho-0 hits

9 posted on 10/08/2003 12:55:14 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Bump. A nice piece of scholarship, written by someone interested in the truth of history and not just promoting absurd Islamist propaganda. Maybe there is hope for an Islamic Reformation after all.
10 posted on 10/08/2003 12:56:26 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
meant to ping you to 9
11 posted on 10/08/2003 12:57:25 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
??? Mecca and Medina get 4 hits total ????? "Prophet" gets 86 hits.
12 posted on 10/08/2003 1:00:54 PM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
"Prophet" gets 86 hits.

That's more than Jew at 23! And Mecca and Medina beat Mount Sinai at 2. Since it's a U Mich site I assume the search engine is reliable. I've posted those numbers before and no one has come up with contrary examples.

13 posted on 10/08/2003 1:11:26 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

On August 5, 2003 Ahmad Muhammad 'Arafa, a columnist for the Egyptian weekly Al-Qahira, which is published by the Egyptian Ministry of Culture, wrote an article rejecting the established Islamic doctrine that the Prophet Muhammad's celebrated "Night Journey" (Koran 17:1) took him from Mecca to Jerusalem. 'Arafa, presenting a new analysis of the Koranic text, asserts that the Night Journey in Surat Al-Isra' (that is, "the Sura of the Night Journey") in the Koran does not refer to a miraculous journey from Mecca to Jerusalem, but to the Prophet's emigration (Hijra) from Mecca to Medina . [1]

Two weeks later, 'Arafa published another article [2] in the same weekly questioning the sanctity of Jerusalem in Islam.

Wow! Is it normal for the Egyptian government to publish something like this?
14 posted on 10/08/2003 1:28:35 PM PDT by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Wow! Is it normal for the Egyptian government to publish something like this?

No, their commentary more commonly runs along the lines of kill the Jews, children of monkeys and pigs, kill the Crusaders, and destroy America.

15 posted on 10/08/2003 2:11:52 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
"kill" gets 44, "slay" gets 27, "destroy" gets 79.
16 posted on 10/08/2003 2:23:21 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This definitely is most fascinating stuff.
17 posted on 10/09/2003 12:06:08 AM PDT by the_greatest_country_ever (Shudder the dystopian nightmare of a world without the greatest country ever. God Bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

From 2003. Just adding this to the GGG catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
Gods, Graves, Glyphs PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

18 posted on 06/30/2006 9:42:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson