To: expatpat
Here's a great new thread over there by "DerekG":
This has been bothering me for several weeks. I always believed that the reason why more people don't vote in presidential elections is because both Democrat and Republican candidates are bearly distinguishable from each other (Carter/Ford, Clinton/Dole, Gore/Bush), but HOW IN THE HELL did a moral man like McGovern, who was probably the last liberal Democrat to run, lose so [GD] badly to Richard Nixon? I wasn't born until 1982, so I'm asking others: Weren't there enough Americans who cared about the direction the country was headed to get their ass out and vote?
I love it. :) This is along the lines of Pauline Kael saying nobody -she- knew voted for Reagan so how the hell did he get elected?
Some of these have to be put-ons. Nobody can be as dumb as they appear.
31 posted on
10/08/2003 8:36:21 AM PDT by
TheBigB
("If my country calls, I will answer. Unless I'm screening."--Homer J. Simpson)
To: TheBigB
--Some of these have to be put-ons. Nobody can be as dumb as they appear.--
Wrong, many are actually worse - they're evil too.
36 posted on
10/08/2003 8:38:47 AM PDT by
fml
To: TheBigB
Yes they can be that dumb. I know several people who swear that NPR is the TRUTH and that all main stream media is run/directed by those "hateful right-wingers". One in particular who thinks Sheila Jackson Lee is the only qualified person for president.
It boggles the mind.
44 posted on
10/08/2003 8:43:34 AM PDT by
Jaded
(nothing but trickery abounds nowadays)
To: TheBigB
Weren't there enough Americans who cared about the direction the country..... Do a Google for "Thomas Eagleton" and "electric shock therapy"
168 posted on
10/08/2003 10:27:19 AM PDT by
BRO68
To: TheBigB
Actually, I think the Pauline Kael quote is from after the 1972 election (she couldn't understand how Nixon won because no one she knew had voted for him). Same difference.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson