To: bootless
vote yes on 53. This is the Democratic platform. The Democrats are against prop 53, which was written by a conservative and is supported by McClintock and Schwarzenegger. The Freeper vote should be yes on prop 53 as it locks the socialist out of raiding the road and bridge building funds. It does not raise taxes, only forces the socialists to spend the money on hard assets rather than soft Democrat breeding programs.
8 posted on
10/07/2003 10:14:29 AM PDT by
Reeses
To: Reeses
>>yes on 53<<
Oops! Well, I guess they could stand to give that one away...
16 posted on
10/07/2003 10:17:49 AM PDT by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: Reeses
I oppose Proposition 53 for the same reason I opposed Proposition 98--because constitutional amendments make lousy fiscal management tools.
33 posted on
10/07/2003 10:33:13 AM PDT by
Poohbah
("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Reeses
The Democrats are against prop 53, which was written by a conservative and is supported by McClintock and Schwarzenegger. The Freeper vote should be yes on prop 53... The Democrats do indeed support prop 53 and Bustamante has TV commercials supporting it. The proposition require that 3% of the annual state budget be spent on infrastrucure/transportation. 3% - no more, no less. It is a fiscal straight jacket.
To: Reeses
...which was written by a conservative... Uh NO, Assemblyman Richman (author of Prop. 53) is by no means a conservative. In fact, he's the most liberal Republican officeholder in the state.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson