Skip to comments.
Did Anyone Receive This Deceptive Robo Call in California?
Armstrong & Getty Show ^
| 10.7.03
| Armstrong & Getty
Posted on 10/07/2003 10:07:12 AM PDT by bootless
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Rats are at it ... again. Anyone receive this? Bueller?
DUMP DAVIS!
1
posted on
10/07/2003 10:07:12 AM PDT
by
bootless
To: Sabertooth; JohnHuang2; kattracks; CounterCounterCulture; Cool Guy; mhking; nutmeg; ...
michael - does this qualify as a Just Damn?
2
posted on
10/07/2003 10:08:20 AM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
10/07/2003 10:08:51 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Sean Hannity; SF Republican; Quix; mewzilla; dighton; pollywog
PING! For outing the RATS.
4
posted on
10/07/2003 10:09:54 AM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: strela; Monti Cello; tom paine 2; onehipdad; pbear8
Ping for exposing the rats.
5
posted on
10/07/2003 10:12:16 AM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: bootless
To: bootless
We got it last night. My wife angrily pushed the button on the answering machine (over the speaker of which we were listening) to cut off the call, so I didn't hear the ending. I figured it was going to be a PUTATIVE McClintock ad (because it started with "values" and tarring Arnold), but one funded by anti-recall forces like the tribes, or some other "independent expenditure" over which McClintock has no control ... at a time when it'd be too late for McClintock to savage the culprits appropriately.
Turns out it's more simple: just your typical made-up group that's supposed to sound like CWA but isn't. Bet it's 100% a Demo/Union front group.
7
posted on
10/07/2003 10:14:23 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: bootless
vote yes on 53. This is the Democratic platform. The Democrats are against prop 53, which was written by a conservative and is supported by McClintock and Schwarzenegger. The Freeper vote should be yes on prop 53 as it locks the socialist out of raiding the road and bridge building funds. It does not raise taxes, only forces the socialists to spend the money on hard assets rather than soft Democrat breeding programs.
8
posted on
10/07/2003 10:14:29 AM PDT
by
Reeses
To: bootless
I got it last night... Stinkin' 'Rats...
9
posted on
10/07/2003 10:15:27 AM PDT
by
Axenolith
(Test Pattern...)
To: bootless
Reminds me of Florida's late DemRat governor, "Walkin' Lawton Chiles" when he was running for re-election. Last two days of the campaign, the oldie-goldies statewide were flooded with phone calls that if the Republican won, social security was kaput.
This must be strategery number one in the liberal's playbook.
Leni
To: hchutch; Chancellor Palpatine; goldstategop; ConservativeMan55; uprisen
PING!
11
posted on
10/07/2003 10:15:53 AM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: bootless
Yup, we did. Just another one of their little games.
12
posted on
10/07/2003 10:16:17 AM PDT
by
Mon
To: CounterCounterCulture
Thanks for the link, CCC.
13
posted on
10/07/2003 10:16:31 AM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: bootless
Did you get Caller ID info on the call? Where did it come from?
14
posted on
10/07/2003 10:16:36 AM PDT
by
strela
(Will Tom McClintock have to "make a re$ervation" to pay back all that Indian money?)
To: bootless
We got that call last evening .....
15
posted on
10/07/2003 10:17:04 AM PDT
by
RightField
(the older you get ..... the older "old" is ......)
To: Reeses
>>yes on 53<<
Oops! Well, I guess they could stand to give that one away...
16
posted on
10/07/2003 10:17:49 AM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: bootless
I don't answer any calls the week before any election.
I let my answering machine screen everything.
Robocalls hate answering machines.
17
posted on
10/07/2003 10:17:51 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: bootless
And yes, you're right: my searches on yahoo, Google, and hotbot revealed no webpage containing the term "council of concerned women."
18
posted on
10/07/2003 10:18:30 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: strela
I didn't receive it. I heard it on the Armstrong & Getty show. Anyone else get a Caller ID?
19
posted on
10/07/2003 10:18:32 AM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget)
To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife; nycgal
Election ping!
20
posted on
10/07/2003 10:19:11 AM PDT
by
Mon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson