[jaime1959]

>>Here's a so-called "conservative" that doesn't seem to believe in the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" that our legal system is founded on. I would like to know how to contact this moron, so that I can give him hell when this all shakes out and Rush is proven innocent!<<


"So-called" because she exercises independent thought and judgement and doesn't march in lockstep defending Rush like, well like all the Clinton apologists?

Grow up! You and a lot of the other lockstep "conservatives" here.

[Protagoras]

Open letter to Rush.

Dear Rush,

I rarely listen to your show anymore because most of what you talk about is football and golf, neither of which you know crap about. But I do listen from time to time just to see if there is anything important being talked about. If you are guilty of the things you are being accused of but refuse to deny, I will never listen again. It's because you stopped "seeking the truth" and your support of the WOD doesn't square with what you are accused of doing.

If you are innocent of the accusations against you, I hope you are totally exonorated and your accusers are made to pay big time.

I'm sure you will concider this to be hate mail, but it's not.

Good luck, Protagoras

[Destructor]

""So-called" because she exercises independent thought and judgement and doesn't march in lockstep defending Rush like, well like all the Clinton apologists?"

"Grow up! You and a lot of the other lockstep "conservatives" here."

So, what you're saying is that Clinton apologists are the ones that are defending Rush Limbaugh? I'm sorry, but that just doesn't make sense. Could you please explain your theory. I'm truly intrigued!