Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh's Secret Life
GOPUSA ^ | 10/06/2003 | Carol Devine-Molin

Posted on 10/07/2003 5:37:58 AM PDT by jimmccleod

Limbaugh's Secret Life By Carol Devine-Molin October 6, 2003

We conservatives are all saddened by the news that Rush Limbaugh is being investigated by law enforcement authorities for illegal buys of prescription painkillers. If accounts being bandied about the media are accurate, then Limbaugh: a) has procured tremendous amounts of highly addictive narcotic medications from his pill-pushing housekeeper Wilma Cline, and, b) is likely to be subjected to arrest. Oh, by the way, dear Wilma sold her hot celebrity story to The National Enquirer for about four hundred thousand dollars. Am I surprised by the overall situation? Yes and no.

Given Limbaugh's outstanding analytical mind and sharp wit, it's difficult to believe that he's constantly in a drug induced state. Who is more articulate and funny than Limbaugh in the world of political commentary? Nobody. However, the hard truth is this: Among entertainers, media personalities and politicos, substance abuse exists in epidemic proportions. For that reason, many conservatives have quickly moved beyond denial and are prepared to hear the worst of it. And I think the majority of conservatives will continue to be compassionate and supportive toward El Rushbo as long as he embraces rehabilitative efforts.

Limbaugh is clearly the most influential conservative of our era, with a radio audience of up to thirty million listeners each week. He's probably converted more Americans to the conservative persuasion than any individual except Ronald Reagan. Understandably, Limbaugh's myriad political foes rejoice in his current troubles. Al Franken and the radical Left are ecstatic. If the tabloid piece largely pans out, Limbaugh has provided his enemies with significant ammunition in efforts to discredit and silence him. But will those hostile to Limbaugh ultimately succeed in ruining him? I doubt it. His current woes are definitely a setback, but not insurmountable. I would state one pivotal caveat. The only individual who can really bring down Limbaugh is Limbaugh himself. Conservatives will maintain solidarity with Limbaugh if, and only if, he dedicates himself to being clean and sober. However, if Limbaugh continues to dabble in drugs, his legion of fans and listeners will slowly drift away.

Although most people are focused upon Limbaugh's legal circumstances, much more is at stake. Drug addiction is a life-threatening condition, which requires proper intervention. Reports indicate that Limbaugh had been rapidly detoxed twice, but returned to drugs both times. Of course he has to undergo another detoxification, and not of the dubious "ultra-rapid" variety that is completed in 24 hours. But what about follow-up care? I'm referring to a program of drug treatment to prevent relapse. Importantly, with relapse there's always the specter of overdose and further physical deterioration. And Limbaugh will have to fight his addictive inclinations for the rest of his life - that is the nature of the beast. It's encouraging to note that many radio and television personalities, such as Don Imus and Larry Kudlow, are succeeding in their day-by-day recovery efforts.

The drugs taken by Limbaugh - OxyContin, Lorcet and Hydrocone - are terribly dangerous by all accounts. Never mind that they cause a host of emotional side effects including paranoia and mood swings. Now, it's coming to light that at least two of these powerful painkillers are linked to sudden hearing loss. In other words, it's conceivable that Limbaugh's deafness was caused by his own addictive behaviors. If that turns out to be the case, it's not only tragic but speaks to the incredible grip of dependency created by these drugs. On some level Rush Limbaugh, like all substance abusers, has self-destructive tendencies. That's his private business, and his responsibility to explore through counseling. For addicts, arrest is often a good thing since the Court system forces them into essential treatment. Roy Black is a very adept criminal attorney who understands these issues. If Limbaugh is charged with a crime, certainly mandatory drug rehabilitation would be part of the plea bargain. I doubt that Limbaugh would be made to serve any jail time.

As to The National Enquirer article, I read it. And I found it to be credible, rife with details that demonstrate the severity of Limbaugh's substance abuse problem. Limbaugh had at least one other drug supplier besides Wilma Cline, referred to as his "FedEx" connection. Apparently OxyContin is Limbaugh's drug of choice. And law enforcement authorities are in possession of a couple of tapes, and a bunch of emails, that substantiate the claims made by Wilma Cline and her husband regarding Limbaugh. The Cline couple cut themselves a very nice deal with the people at The National Enquirer that are experts at marketing


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amocopharmacy; dennysparkinglotdr; drugs; eib; gopusa; limbaugh; maharushie; rush; rushlimbaugh; rushtojudgement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-386 next last
To: Servant of the 9
Pick up some extra disability and life insurance before the habit grows to mainlining high performance motorcycles.

I did the bike thing. Raced motocross, short track, etc. when I was younger. The good thing about that was that I never had to buy the bikes. Recently, I have been watching that "American Chopper" show on cable and I think the custom choppers are cool.

101 posted on 10/07/2003 7:15:35 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jimmccleod
Now, it's coming to light that at least two of these powerful painkillers are linked to sudden hearing loss.

I had never heard this before. If that's the case, then it does make Rush's hear loss look very peculiar. Additionally, his many absenses from the air in the last year might have been due to stints in rehab. It's all pretty interesting in retrospect.

102 posted on 10/07/2003 7:18:02 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neets
On some level Rush Limbaugh, like all substance abusers, has self-destructive tendencies

THIS is what jumped out at me! How does she know this??? and what tendencies are those exactly??

Maybe a 'lil birdie told her, or she consulted a crystal ball. Or maybe she's simply another Rush hater who would enjoy seeing him go down in flames.

103 posted on 10/07/2003 7:28:14 AM PDT by Kathleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
"The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."

Tough to backpedal on that one.

104 posted on 10/07/2003 7:29:39 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: sonserae
Perhaps...you don't know the difference between an elected official, paid handsomely by the US taxpayer...and a Private Enterprise paid radio personality. Duhhh.

And where do you see any comparison?

105 posted on 10/07/2003 7:29:52 AM PDT by John Doe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
Here's a so-called "conservative" that doesn't seem to believe in the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" that our legal system is founded on.

Where do you get that??? Here's what she said:

We conservatives are all saddened by the news that Rush Limbaugh is being investigated by law enforcement authorities for illegal buys of prescription painkillers.
Was there anything accusatory about that? Anything judgmental? No. Rush apparently is being investigated. It was a statement of fact. There was no passing of judgment whatsoever. Lighten up.
106 posted on 10/07/2003 7:33:35 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
You think for a moment he could keep the audience? You think anyone we have in our locker can do what Rush does? Or did?

I don't.
107 posted on 10/07/2003 7:33:37 AM PDT by Ronin (Qui tacet consentit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: fabriclady
"I will withhold judgement of Rush until I hear his side."

15 posted on 10/07/2003 6:49 AM MDT by fabriclady

Me too. But as a Rush fan and an ex drug and alcohol abuser myself I can not help but wish Rush would comment one way or the other soon. Stalling around certainly gives the appearance of impropriety and even reminds me of Bill Clinton's style. Rush's silence on this matter is not just hurting him it is hurting us his followers who have been so proud of him.

I hope he denies this today. Or admits guilt. Either way would be more manly than quibbling over fine legal points like a liberal caught in the head lights.

I pray I am wrong and it is all just some clever trick on Rush's part to befuddle his enemies and teach me a lesson in loyalty.

108 posted on 10/07/2003 7:34:07 AM PDT by carpio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: steve8714
This stuff is also available from Paki and SA over the 'net, thanks to AARP.

Somebody should've told Rush.

109 posted on 10/07/2003 7:36:32 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kathleen
Hi sweetie!!!!!!

((((HUGS))))

Or maybe she's simply another Rush hater who would enjoy seeing him go down in flames.

Ya think????

110 posted on 10/07/2003 7:37:54 AM PDT by Neets (Frogs have it easy..they can eat whatever's bugging them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: jimmccleod
On some level Rush Limbaugh, like all substance abusers, has self-destructive tendencies.

Assuming facts not in evidence.

111 posted on 10/07/2003 7:39:07 AM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
I have yet to hear how someone can take, on average, 66 oxycodone pills per day for over a year.

Assuming he was buying that many pills, nothing indicates he was using that many daily. I've had a close friend who was a pill addict. From that experience I'd say it's more likely that he was stockpiling pills so he'd always be assured of having some.

It's silly to take the number of pills he bought, divide it by a certain number of days and conclude from that he's used X number of pills per day.

112 posted on 10/07/2003 7:40:48 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
Sarcastically challenged?
113 posted on 10/07/2003 7:43:48 AM PDT by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: jimmccleod; All
I think this woman is right. This drug story is not going away and Rush's hiring of a big dollar criminal defense attorney (Roy Black) is not the sort of thing a totally innocent celebrity does when a tabloid prints a libelous accusation.

His refusal to discuss the matter reeks of lawyer-directed defensiveness.

If he's addicted Rush doesn't need detox. He needs rehab. At least 28 days in a residential facility and zero ego-inflating activity during that time. That means a leave of absence from public life.

If addicted he must put recovery ahead of everything else, including his "fans".
114 posted on 10/07/2003 7:44:14 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimmccleod
If this story is true, RUSH will kick the addiction if he hasn't already. Life will go on. The liberals will continue to have their panties in a twist over him.
115 posted on 10/07/2003 7:44:54 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neets
That's MY personal wild speculation and I'm sticking with it. ;-)

((((HUGS BACK))))

116 posted on 10/07/2003 7:45:29 AM PDT by Kathleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
If you were innocent of any drug connection, and you got wrapped up in something like this, you'd want the best damn " big dollar criminal defense attorney" you could find.

Notice, I did say "if."

117 posted on 10/07/2003 7:46:18 AM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
You think for a moment he could keep the audience? You think anyone we have in our locker can do what Rush does? Or did?

I don't.

There are plenty out there that do what Rush does and do it just as well as Rush. Hannity, Ingraham, Medved, Savage, Reagan, Boortz, and of course, the Other Radio Network- Radio Free Republic to name a few.

118 posted on 10/07/2003 7:48:36 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

Misuse of Pain Drug Linked to Hearing Loss

LA Times, 2001

But the hearing loss problem may be "much more prevalent than we think," said Dr. Akira Ishiyama, an assistant professor of otolaryngology at UCLA Medical School who has treated nearly a dozen cases. Some doctors, he said, may not have drawn a connection between Vicodin use and sudden hearing loss in patients because they "haven't been looking for it."

When doctors see isolated cases of sudden hearing loss, they may believe it's just a chance occurrence. At the same time, patients may not realize--or admit-- their addiction to painkillers. Vicodin is typically prescribed for short-term use of two to three weeks at most, with patients taking one pill every six hours. But many of the patients who have suffered hearing loss were taking 20 pills or more a day for at least two months, doctors said.


119 posted on 10/07/2003 7:49:16 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
I have read a number of times on these threads that Rush would be taking about 60-70 pills a day based on the number purchased. Does anyone realize that pills have a shelf life? Just because you are buying them buy the thousands doesn't mean you are taking dozens per day. If you can get a large quantity in one purchase that might last a few years, why not do that, instead of many small purchases that increase the chances of getting caught in a sting? Not really important, but a little bug-a-boo of mine that I haven't seen anyone point out. I also believe Rush is innocent. I was very upset about this the day it came out until I heard it was reported by the NE!
120 posted on 10/07/2003 7:52:41 AM PDT by Mama Shawna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 381-386 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson