Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Content of Our California
Tech Central Station ^ | 10/7/2003 | Radley Balko

Posted on 10/07/2003 12:33:20 AM PDT by SpinMaster-Ldot

Lost in the groping, the deficit, the child actors and the general mayhem that is the California recall circus is an important ballot initiative that could do wonders for the ethnic and racial climate of a state that's about ten years ahead of the rest of the country on the demographic curve.

Proposition 54, also known as Ward Connerly's "Racial Privacy Initiative," would bar California state government from using racial classifications in its official business. Sadly, the measure seems to be losing support in the polls, perhaps in part because even Republican frontrunner Arnold Schwarzenegger hasn't the courage to stand up to California's racial demagogues and publicly support it.

That's too bad. Because America -- and especially California -- is becoming increasingly blind to race. We could probably abandon race completely in a generation or two, if only our government would let us.

Take a walk through Washington, D.C.'s "Chinatown," and you'd probably be surprised to find both a Hooters and a Fuddrucker's. There's Irish bar, Fado. There's also a barbecue joint, which bills itself "the best Texas barbecue in Chinatown." Venture north to the Adams-Morgan neighborhood, you can sample the food of a dozen different regions of the world in just a few blocks. A few blocks up, try the U-Street neighborhood, where trendy lounges and upscale health clubs sit next to blues and jazz clubs that have stood since the 1920s. Spill out into the suburbs, and you'll find a mini Adams-Morgan in Arlington, Virginia's Clarendon, and a panoply of Indian, Latino, and Asian influences intermeshed in Alexandria, Falls Church and Fairfax.

In a recent Washington Post column, the Davenport Institute's Joel Kotkin and Thomas Tseng write that "Shopping centers in Southern California's San Fernando Valley, the epitome of an immigrant-oriented suburban area, are likely to be multiethnic, with stores advertising in Russian, Farsi, Armenian and Spanish, as well as the ubiquitous English."

They write that today, 51% of Asians live in the suburbs, as well as 43% of Latinos and 32% of African-Americans. White Americans, meanwhile, are rediscovering the allure of urban living in cities such as Washington, Atlanta and Chicago. In the last few years an upscale shopping center featuring a Best Buy, a Bed, Bath & Beyond and a natural foods grocery store opened just a few blocks from what was once Chicago's notorious Cabrini Green housing projects. The buzz phrase in urban planning today isn't "white flight," it's "gentrification."

A 1997 Gallup poll found that 57% of teens would consider dating someone of another race, up from just 17% in 1980. Remarkably, a full 100% of white respondents said that race would not prevent them from voting for a candidate for political office, up from 75% in 1980. Between 1990 and 2000, the number of babies born to black-white couples nearly tripled. And in California, a baby born today is more likely to be born to an interracial couple than to two black parents. Kotkin and Tseng cite a 2002 Pew/Kaiser poll showing that just 7% of second generation Latinos consider Spanish their primary language -- 93% are either bilingual (47%), or consider English their first language (46%). Jump to the third generation, and the English-dominant number jumps to 78%.

On a personal level, Americans are clearly in the process of erasing the boundaries of race. We're intermarrying, we're adopting interracially, and we're absorbing the benefits of a multiethnic society.

This only makes sense, as the scientists who unmasked the human genome found remarkably few differences between the races in the biological stuff that makes us human. In fact, there's likely to be more genetic variation between two random members of the same race than between to random individuals from different races. Dr. J. Craig Venter, who is president of Celera Genomics, the company that first completed the human genome map, has repeatedly expressed his frustration that contrary to the evidentiary biology available, doctors and scientists continue to cling to what is really a social construct.

The problem of course is that for many people, there's still far too much race-based incentive to abandon racial classification. Government still doles out tax dollars guided by race- and ethnic-based demographics -- over $185 billion in race or ethnic-based set asides, by one estimate. Consequently, the interest groups that sell race -- and the nativists who play off of fears of it -- have a vested interest in keeping us thinking about color, language and nationalism.

And so we get the spectacle of an America increasingly oblivious to race, an America looking to leave ethnicity behind -- and an American government hell-bent on preventing that from happening, but under the premise that it's doing just the opposite.

Before the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the U.S. was actually moving away from state-sanctioned race consciousness. The ACLU and the NAACP lobbied against including race in the 1960 U.S. Census. A few states had already stopped classifying by race.

The U.S. Census had just five racial classifications in 1970. After thirty years of kowtowing to identity politics, the 2000 Census had over 60, 120 if you include ethnicity. Ethnic "advocacy" groups then scramble to "recruit" members to ensure roomy stalls at the public trough. One example of how this has played out: Despite intermarriage, assimilation, and the statistics cited above, the United States somehow found 65% more "American Indians" in 2000 than it had in 1990.

Unfortunate timing has put Proposition 54 on the recall ballot, instead of a traditional election ballot and so it's been buried by the shenanigans of the last few months. That's regrettable, since the only people who are interested in it, then, are those who have the most to lose by its success.

Far from being the radically conservative undertaking its detractors claim it to be, the Racial Privacy Initiative is really little more than asking government to mirror what most of us have already done in our private lives -- push race to the margins, where it belongs. But Proposition 54's likeliest proponents -- California's Republicans -- have concluded that they'd rather rally behind a popular actor who's squishy on the issue than give race-blind government the public debate it deserves.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; proposition54; racialprivacy; wardconnerly
A MUST READ AND EMAIL THIS MORNING BEFORE YOU VOTE! THIS IS A VERY GOOD ARTICLE about a proposition that is losing because of lack of support from CA Republicans.
1 posted on 10/07/2003 12:33:22 AM PDT by SpinMaster-Ldot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SpinMaster-Ldot
Arnold called me a "right wing crazy" for supporting it.
2 posted on 10/07/2003 12:34:33 AM PDT by TheAngryClam (A proud member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
STOP THE INSANITY
Tick them off! Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!


3 posted on 10/07/2003 12:35:21 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpinMaster-Ldot
Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

4 posted on 10/07/2003 12:50:18 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpinMaster-Ldot
I'm voting for it. It's obvious why it's doing so poorly and that's because its opponents have managed to paint it as an initiative preventing the gathering of information which might be used in the area of medical research.

Ward know's what he's trying to eliminate; which is the simplistic use of statistical models to establish that racism is rampant in this country. Which is obviously based upon a presupposition that that's the case and worse doesn't provide any workable solution to what may account for these statistical deviations.

Interestingly, a study was done of UC Berkeley's large differences in SAT scores of students they'd admitted last year. The deviations were being questioned because perhaps they might result in a dumbing down of the University's "high" academic standards. Guess what piece of information was left out of the study, which was easily available? Race!

5 posted on 10/07/2003 1:13:41 AM PDT by Coeur de Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpinMaster-Ldot
The last glimmering hope of having a conservative agenda dominating politics is about to be terminated. There is now officialy NO hope, zero, nada, that we can restore America through any type of political process. We are about to reach terminal velocity, and America has two choices. Continue to follow man down the wide path to destruction. Or make Jesus President of your mind, soul, and spirit, and enter into the Kingdom alive, as God will soon flush this completely corrupted system down the toliet, and anybody who tries to continue to keep it alive with it. That's the only choice that matters, now and in the future. Are you going to be a man of sin, or a man of God. You better start taking it very seriously, because as sure as the sun comes up, those will soon be your only two choices.
6 posted on 10/07/2003 1:18:38 AM PDT by Russell Scott (If America raises up Christ, Christ will raise up America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpinMaster-Ldot
perhaps in part because even Republican frontrunner Arnold Schwarzenegger hasn't the courage to stand up to California's racial demagogues and publicly support it.

Get used to this.
Plug in "gun control", "abortion", "welfare for illegals", "enviro-nazism", or "homosexual adoption", and the story could be the same.

7 posted on 10/07/2003 1:22:22 AM PDT by Lancey Howard (Conservatives, FLEE! Don't be the last white farmer in Zimbabwe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coeur de Lion
bttt
8 posted on 10/07/2003 1:30:30 AM PDT by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SpinMaster-Ldot; Sabertooth
I thought this was a beautifully written article and deserves wider circulation.

D
9 posted on 10/07/2003 5:30:51 AM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
Isn't that a little silly?

This is just one state. Not the whole country, and not all of "politics".

Since God didn't intervene during the much wilder 60s, I don't see Him as about to do anything about our present situation.

D
10 posted on 10/07/2003 5:33:35 AM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson