Please show some support for Congressman King; contact him at peter.king@mail.house.gov.
http://www.house.gov/king/
1 posted on
10/06/2003 9:14:29 PM PDT by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
GO KING!
Hey, why doesn't he run for the Senate? A suburban Republican, he would be a strong nominee.
To: All
SHOW YOUR PRIDE! SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
10/06/2003 9:16:30 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: jmstein7
It's about time someone is asking the right questions, and advocating what should be done. Mr. Wilson is the one who should be in the hot seat!
To: jmstein7
What a refreshing change from that lemon sucker Chuck Hagel.
To: jmstein7
I agree with King.
6 posted on
10/06/2003 9:32:42 PM PDT by
sport
To: jmstein7
Too bad that John Walker and his son, Aldrich Ames, and a couple of other known traitors (whose wholesale selling of America's secrets can be traced directly to the deaths of CIA operatives) were not executed themselves.
We haven't taken treason seriously in 20 years--why should anyone now?
Frankly, I think it's about time Tenet took the hit. He was given a pass when he was held over from the Clinton administration. He got another pass after 9/11. Then another for the ***tty CIA work about WMD. Why should he be given a pass on this one? Heck, he's probably the leaker helping the Hillary agenda along!
10 posted on
10/06/2003 9:46:01 PM PDT by
MHT
To: jmstein7
Why did they pick the guy who was anti-Bush, anti-war with Iraq, to go over and conduct a really half-assed investigation of Niger?WOW!!! I like it!!!
11 posted on
10/06/2003 9:47:28 PM PDT by
krb
(the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
To: jmstein7
Wouldn't that be Robert Novak?
15 posted on
10/06/2003 10:21:35 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: jmstein7; piasa; seamole; BOBTHENAILER; Miss Marple; PhilDragoo; backhoe; ASA Vet
Congressman King asked the real nut cutting question that I posted on 10/1 re Wilson.
If Wilson went on a real mission for the CIA not some set up job, he would have had to sign secrecy agreements before and after his trip. Disclosure of his mission if he had a mission would be a serious crime.
Here is what I posted re what would have been the normal process re secrecy agreements if Wilson't trip had been a legitimate one.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/992865/posts?page=23#23 To: prognostigaator
Excellent questions.
I have another one.
Did he sign the usual secrecy forms one normally signs with the farm before and after they do a trip like this?
Those forms are very specific about not disclosing:
Where you went?
Who you saw?
What you discussed.
I wonder if Wilson killed any of our agents in Niger with his loose lips?
Then did the loose lips of the lunatic lefty mediots kill anyone?
Wilson and his buddies in bed with him are far more dangerous to our sources than anyone else on this planet.
23 posted on 10/01/2003 7:41 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
16 posted on
10/06/2003 11:57:38 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Fight Liberalism 24/7/365 for only 17 cents / day. Donate $5 monthly to Free Republic.)
To: jmstein7
Since Mr. Wilson says he doesn't know who sent him, would not recognize them if he met them on the street, did not write a report, only an op-ed maybe this was a hoax.
Maybe he was never "officially" sent to begin with.
To: jmstein7
Bump
To: jmstein7
bump
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson