LA TImes Spikes Clinton's Rape, Promotes Arnold's (unknown) Accusers.

self | 10-5-03 | Robert A. Cook

[Robert A Cook PE]

Here, the Los Angeles Times removed OUT references to Clinton's rape INSIDE a column by George Will. Reported by Fax and NewsMax.

http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2001/1/17/222131

But here Terry claims the LA Times was looking at Juanita even before 1992! (Of course, Terry also claims NewsMax is wrong ...)

http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/outthere/otnmeye.html

here, Media Research Center (Media Watch) compares Juanita's, Anita's, and Clinton's coverage ....

http://secure.mediaresearch.org/news/mediawatch/1999/mw19990308rev.html

Here, the LA Times is actually creditted with even MENTIONING Juanita's accusation! (But, to be truthful, the Times actually only reported that the TV would carry the story..)

http://www.arationaladvocate.com/majormedia.htm

Here is Salon's summary (mostly of Clinton-supporting stories, of course) of that period: Use it to see what WAS published about her rape.

http://www.salon.com/news/special/clinton/date.html

Freeper Alamo Girl's list is more inclusive; and tells of WHY the national press corpse is an "insider's club" catring to to its own members - with impartial reporting and accuracy thrown away.

http://www.alamo-girl.com/0291.htm

VOA covered the story - (See Guthrie's Voice and text) - But again, this ISN'T the LA Times covering the story. Further - it's one paragraph on one day - and ignored from then on.

http://www.hri.org/news/usa/voa/1999/99-02-26.voa.html

Not surprisingly, democrats.com denies the whole thing happened: while blasting Fund with even more accusations! (Needless to say, nothing here about the LA Times ignoring the story...)

http://www.democrats.com/preview.cfm?term=right%20wing%20media

Again, the best summary of several news outlets is from Media Research Center: Demonstrating why their slogan should be "Only the news we choose fit to print." Good background on both the NY and LA Times here.

https://secure.mediaresearch.org/news/nq/best/nq1999webbest.html

This is the only "technical" (legal) summary of the various reports (and denials!) made on Jaunita's rape charge. It's in pdf format. Remember, the democrats are claiming she ISN'T reliable because of her inital denials.

http://www.nyu.edu/pages/lawreview/75/4/buell.pdf

Much more "editorial" in nature, this summarizes a far wider "attitude" at the Times against ALL oppoenets of the Democrat Party at ALL levels.

http://raginglady.com/2000_election1.htm

[Robert A Cook PE]

This is a series of stories (and links - since we can't print the LA Times stories themselves!) about Juanita's accusations of rape, gathered from a Google serach for "Los Angleles Times Juanita Clinton rape

Trying to summarize the accusations against the Los Angeles Times.

Comparing them against what the story they are now peddling against Arnold, and how they (and the rest of the national media) protected Clinton.

Haven't tried a Google search for Bush + Drunk + 2000 .... But I bet it would yield some interesting results also.

[Support Free Republic]

Flame warriors, unite!
	Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[Russell Scott]

The Republican party is going to have hell to pay if Arnold turns out to be the flaming liberal he looks to be.

[goldstategop]

It is a valid concern but the test will be what he does not what he says. If Arnold sticks to conservative principles, he will get our help and undying devotion. If he doesn't, well, he just won't get re-elected. I trust that my vote will not be in vain cause we need a real change AND a real leader here in California.

[Robert A Cook PE]

The key isn't Arnold - Nor any other candidate either!

The single most important factor is the removal of a democrat from office - AFTER he raises taxes, and AFTER he lies about the state of the budget.

NOBODY in the national dnc expected the recall of their "future star" governor - DESPITE the "impartial" and helpful democrat news media!

Hillary's ONLY tactic in 2004 or 2008 is raising taxes, spending more, and ladling benefits to the "poor" and "oppressed" - and here, in the most liberal state in the West - they (the tax more and spend more liberals) are losing their governor!

[YaYa123]

WOW!!!! There's so much here to read. The scary part is how much we still don't know about the LATimes. Ceci Connelly has been on FOXNews twice now, defending the LATimes. I wish Brit would smack her. Diane Feinstein on Hardball, and even Tom McClintock wouldn't admit the LATimes was playing dirty politics with these late allegations coming out from anonymous women. (I'm thinking California politicians don't want to cross the LATimes)

This is a great post..thank you.

[jonno]

bump

[Robert A Cook PE]

CNBC has a LA Times lap dog repeating much the same blather: "It took a long time to research the story .... We had to be very careful about the story .... We would do the same thing for any story ....."

But here we find out that their "carefully researched" story is debunked (in one "gropee's case") overnight as a liar, previous criminal, and dope lackey!

But attacking the one complaining IS what the demo's do. One must be careful - not all criminals stay evil.

[YaYa123]

"But attacking the one complaining IS what the demo's do"

That's right. In fact, the Clintons hired Betsey Wright to go find the offended women, attacking them as "bimbos" before they were even identified and contacted with bribes and threats.

And I have noticed, the major line of Arnold's defense strategy hasn't been to attack the women. Rather, it's an attack, (a fair one, I think), on The Los Angeles Times, and their deliberate attempt to malign Arnold so late in the game that he doesn't have time to defend himself properly.

Arnold was obviously a known and accepted scoundrel in the bodybuilding culture, long before he became a Hollywood celebrity. It must have been an accepted part of the sexy, sweaty, locker room culture. When Arnold got famous, he joined another over-sexed culture...Hollywood.

I think it's ludicrous AND hypocritical for the media, liberal women activists, and democrat politicians, to be irate with Arnold's behavior, while condoning Bill Clintons. They do too, that's why the left avoids any mention of Juanita Broaddrick and even Kathleen Willey. That's why they bring up Monica Lewinsky instead, calling that "sex between consenting adults".

Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick. Shame on the left for belittling, ignoring, and even condoning, (by their silence), what Juanita suffered at the hand of Bill Clinton.

[Robert A Cook PE]

Bump.

While it's easiest to find the Los Angeles Times central role in their prejudices and lack of character, we shouldn't forget the role the rest of the media plays: Their feedback is the only thing that could keep the LA Times, and NY Times, "honest" in the future.

It won't happen, of course, but this thread identifies how CBS (Dan Rather in particular) treated this episode:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/996616/posts?page=14#14

[YaYa123]

"Their feedback is the only thing that could keep the LA Times, and NY Times, "honest" in the future."

I think this time it's the voters who are going to keep The LA Times and The NY Times "honest". Think about it. If Arnold wins big, I'm talking BIG, it will signal to the media that their nasty, late political hit pieces are not only rejected, but abhorred by voters. I think it will make them think twice before they do it again.

Talking heads are already discussing this on the air, another reason The LATimes, (and their defenders), are so adamant that the short campaign time, and the reporter's diligent, time-consuming investigation is why the article came out so late, and had nothing to do with the LATimes institutional support of democrats. I'm amazed people will risk their professional credibility to try and sell that buttload of crap. Ceci Connelly, Jeffrey Birnbaum on FOXNews, are two of them.