Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Asserts Israel's Right to Defense
Yahoo ^

Posted on 10/06/2003 9:08:30 AM PDT by sonsofliberty2000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
New on Patriot Paradox: Interview with Carlo3b
1 posted on 10/06/2003 9:08:31 AM PDT by sonsofliberty2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

GOD BLESS OUR MILITARY
THANK A VET!
MAKE A DONATION TODAY

Keep Our Republic Free

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com


STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER and say THANKS to Jim Robinson!
IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR
Thanks



2 posted on 10/06/2003 9:09:31 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Thank you, Mr. President!
3 posted on 10/06/2003 9:10:07 AM PDT by Bulldog1967 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Despite the obligatory public caveat urging Israel not to escalate, it's much more an endorsement of the right of self defend.

Prairie
4 posted on 10/06/2003 9:12:51 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (I'm a monthly donor to FR. And proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Good.
5 posted on 10/06/2003 9:13:30 AM PDT by knighthawk (And for the name of peace, we will prevail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulldog1967
GWB Is The Man!
6 posted on 10/06/2003 9:14:01 AM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Bush has shown a surprisingly high calcium content in his backbone twice in the last 7 days. He spoke up on behalf of Rush and he has unplugged Colin Powell, justly criticized Howard Dean's beloved soldiers of Hamas for their homocide bombings. By asserting Israel's right to self-defence, he gives Syria reason to think about their continued support of the terrorist camps in the Bekkau Valley.
7 posted on 10/06/2003 9:14:05 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("We hang petty thieves, we elevate the great ones to public office." Aesop, 600BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Another demonstration of why I love this President!
8 posted on 10/06/2003 9:14:41 AM PDT by zencat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zencat
Indeed. It's time we stand ground against terrorism again.
9 posted on 10/06/2003 9:16:23 AM PDT by knighthawk (And for the name of peace, we will prevail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Despite the obligatory public caveat urging Israel not to escalate, it's much more an endorsement of the right of self defend.

Thats how I see it, too.

10 posted on 10/06/2003 9:18:42 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Bush should use this sentance:
"Join us, and live in peace or stay your current couorse and face oblideration." ~Klaatu from The Day the Earth Stood Still
11 posted on 10/06/2003 9:20:01 AM PDT by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Bush should continue to be aggressive on foreign policy issues; even more aggressive if possible.
12 posted on 10/06/2003 9:21:03 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
Good answer
13 posted on 10/06/2003 9:21:39 AM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: knighthawk
It's time we stand ground against terrorism again.

Again? What do you think is going on in Iraq and Afghanistan (and probably numerous other countries we don't know about)?

15 posted on 10/06/2003 9:34:12 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Agreed. The real quagmire in the War on Terror is having to squabble with the Democrats and the media over "leaks," "yellowcake," so-forth and so-on. We need to refocus our attention on the bigger picture of terrorism internationally, and within the region. I hope that the Israeli attack on Syria will force the US to again look at the bigger picture.
16 posted on 10/06/2003 9:38:54 AM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000; 2sheep; Jeremiah Jr; Simcha7; yonif; LarryM; Yehuda
On Yom Kippur, it's especially important for the president to answer correctly.
17 posted on 10/06/2003 9:46:17 AM PDT by Thinkin' Gal (<541>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
"We need to refocus our attention on the bigger picture of terrorism internationally, and within the region. I hope that the Israeli attack on Syria will force the US to again look at the bigger picture."

___No, the Arab-Israeli conflict
is not part of the US War on Terror except insofar as the
radical Arab terrorists extend beyond that region. (For example, Bush has cut off US-based Hamas funding,)

The key phrase that Bush used
was "global reach."

The causes of the Arab-Israeli
conflict go back to the 1948 UN
Partition and must be solved with
reference to that starting point
within the region.

That the Arabs have resorted to
terrorism after having suffering
numerous conventional military
defeats does not, by itself, require that the US treat the
Palestinians like the Taliban.



18 posted on 10/06/2003 9:48:05 AM PDT by Bushbacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sonsofliberty2000
im still trying to understand the rationale for israel entering another country to destroy an islamic jihad facility... im also trying to understand bush making that comment about "defending oneself"... im also interested in knowing if syria condemned the attacks on israel and what
they are doing to prevent future attacks... can anyone answer this? i understand that israel was attacked in a most gruesome way, but shouldnt they have at least consulted with syria before just launching an attack in its territories? consistent with bush's foreign policy history, after going in and kicking afghanistan & iraq regimes out for defending terrorists, i guess he's trying to make a point to syria as well... if syria wont at least condemn these attacks on israel then they are no better than terrorists and should be considered that way, and dealt with.

im on bush's side, but i think he's starting to lose control of the situation that 9/11 created...
19 posted on 10/06/2003 9:52:32 AM PDT by Mxyzptlk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moleman
Always liked "But if you threaten to extend your violence, this Earth of yours will be reduced to a burned out cinder."

Oh, I believe Klaatu said "...pursue your present course ..."

20 posted on 10/06/2003 9:55:29 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Veni Vidi Velcro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson