To: sinkspur; Itzlzha
Deacon:
If you are not pro-sodomy, then why were you a supporter of the sodomites in the Texas sodomy case before the SCOTUS even decided it and why do you support Schwarzenkennedy who supports the "domestic partnership" of lavenders not as crime but as some sort of civil right to be enforced by legislation??
540 posted on
10/06/2003 12:50:28 PM PDT by
BlackElk
(Schwarzenegger is as Republican as Pete Wilson or George McGovern or Hillary!!!)
To: BlackElk
If you are not pro-sodomy, then why were you a supporter of the sodomites in the Texas sodomy case before the SCOTUS even decided it and why do you support Schwarzenkennedy who supports the "domestic partnership" of lavenders not as crime but as some sort of civil right to be enforced by legislation?? Being against laws on the books which advocate putting gays in jail for doing the very same thing straights do, with impunity, is not being "pro-sodomy."
I don't get to vote in California. Were I there, I would vote for Arnold, because I believe incrementalism is better than getting nothing.
546 posted on
10/06/2003 12:56:46 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from a shelter! You'll save at least one life, maybe two!)
To: BlackElk
I'll ask one more time - why won't you answer my Post 480?
551 posted on
10/06/2003 1:00:43 PM PDT by
strela
(Will Tom McClintock have to "make a re$ervation" to pay back all that Indian money?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson