[sinkspur]

If you are not pro-sodomy, then why were you a supporter of the sodomites in the Texas sodomy case before the SCOTUS even decided it and why do you support Schwarzenkennedy who supports the "domestic partnership" of lavenders not as crime but as some sort of civil right to be enforced by legislation??

Being against laws on the books which advocate putting gays in jail for doing the very same thing straights do, with impunity, is not being "pro-sodomy."

I don't get to vote in California. Were I there, I would vote for Arnold, because I believe incrementalism is better than getting nothing.

[eskimo]

I don't get to vote in California. Were I there, I would vote for Arnold, because I believe incrementalism is better than getting nothing.

So, what you advocate is grabbing a little political power now and to hell with the future and those that follow.

That seems like a prime example of the "immoral greed" the author attributes to conservative mutants.