[RonDog]

"It seems likely that a solid majority will reject the Times as untrustworthy. The paper may console itself that the electorate doesn't care about the charges, but that would be more self-delusion.

California doesn't trust its major newspaper.
Not in the least. Now that's a story worth covering." - Hugh Hewitt

ping

[MeekOneGOP]

Wow! ...

What is different about the paper's naked and increasingly wild coverage of anti-Arnold charges is the reaction among even long-suffering Times watchers. A thousand readers actually cancelled subscriptions after Thursday's report on Arnold (that's the number released by the Times; who knows what the real total is). The outrage and anger of readers can be heard on any talk-radio station. So loud is the din that the Times was obliged to cover it.

"Hasta La Vista, Baby !!"
(Click here or on the pics !)

[DLfromthedesert]

Let's hope the Cali voters see through the the ads by the arch-hypocrites at moveon.org ... Remember Clinton?

But you have to admit, these people have cojones; wish the Republicans could get a few.