1 posted on
10/04/2003 10:24:52 PM PDT by
jmstein7
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: jmstein7; All
2 posted on
10/04/2003 10:28:55 PM PDT by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
Davis sounds like Hildabeast:
"Fu---k fu--king Fu---k fu_ker!"
3 posted on
10/04/2003 10:29:27 PM PDT by
SkyPilot
To: All
There's A Better Way To Beat The Media Clymers (And You Don't Have To Skate)!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
4 posted on
10/04/2003 10:29:48 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: jmstein7
Join Us
Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!
![](http://members.cox.net/rightstuff/RDThread.gif )
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin
5 posted on
10/04/2003 10:31:06 PM PDT by
DoctorZIn
To: jmstein7; CyberAnt
Bump and ping!
Thanks for posting this.
CyberAnt, this must be why she was on FNC today.
7 posted on
10/04/2003 10:34:30 PM PDT by
dixiechick2000
("Our Al-Mighty will whip your Al-Qaeda."---jigsaw..... Too true, and too clever, to be retired.)
To: jmstein7
When Bernard Goldberg wrote "Bias" all the liberal media stood about and said "Golly, this guy is a whack."
They lined up the usual suspects, such as Dan Rather and the Jenkins guy, all of whom were shocked that anyone could question their integrity.
In the interim the NYT has shown its shoddy side, and now the LA Times has joined the club.
The LA Times has become a partisan partner of Gray Davis in the recall campaign.
Time for conservatives to go after those who put their advertisements in the rag.
Once a paper gives up its objectivity, it is fair prey for other partisans.
8 posted on
10/04/2003 10:41:46 PM PDT by
auntdot
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Los Angeles Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
This is the Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this is a medium- to high-volume list.
Please feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of this ping list. I can't catch them all!
10 posted on
10/04/2003 10:45:15 PM PDT by
Timesink
(For a good time, visit clark2004.meetup.com. Ask for Mary!)
To: jmstein7
Thanks for posting this. Jill Stewart is finally getting the appreciation she deserves. She is a great reporter!!
17 posted on
10/04/2003 11:06:24 PM PDT by
abigail2
(Refuse to do business with companies that are bilingual...)
To: deport; PhiKapMom; nopardons; onyx; FairOpinion; autoresponder; MeeknMing; Tamsey; ArneFufkin; ...
Ping!
20 posted on
10/04/2003 11:12:32 PM PDT by
Tempest
(9th inning of a winning game and you guys are still whining to trade pitchers?!)
To: jmstein7
BTTT
To: jmstein7
This isn't particularly relevant, but I have always suspected that Davis is a bit "light in the heels". Gay, in other words.
He runs a bit too tight. The story about the pictures on the wall goes to that.
To: jmstein7
The Times was onto the story, too, and we crossed paths. My article, headlined "Closet Wacko Vs. Mega Fibber," detailed how Davis flew into a rage one day because female staffers had rearranged framed artwork on the walls of his office. If Gray Davis isn't married he should hook up with Martha Stewart. They seem to have things in common. Not only do they both have an abnormally violent opinion on home furnishings but they also both seem to be unable to take responsibility for their actions. They could spend hours together sipping Chardonnay and whining about how unfair the world has treated them. Ahhh, I can see it now, this would truly be a romance made in heaven
43 posted on
10/05/2003 5:19:13 AM PDT by
foolscap
To: jmstein7
Total ping
45 posted on
10/05/2003 7:02:27 AM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: jmstein7
Democrat immuity rule story
48 posted on
10/05/2003 8:08:37 AM PDT by
VOA
To: jmstein7
For Republicans, any misconduct around women is cause for vilification.
For Democrats, any misconduct around women is cause for reelection.
50 posted on
10/05/2003 8:37:12 AM PDT by
Imal
(I set my browser to "Maximum Sarcasm", then broke off the knob.)
To: jmstein7
bttt
To: jmstein7
bump
54 posted on
10/05/2003 9:15:35 AM PDT by
I'm ALL Right!
(He is no fool who would give what he cannot keep to gain what he can never lose. - Jim Elliot)
To: jmstein7
Great find! Time to go on the offensive!!
57 posted on
10/05/2003 9:38:41 AM PDT by
aquila48
To: jmstein7
Where was this weeks ago, when something could have been done about it ?
Where is the original story ?
This could almost be bait for a final "Arnold uses the same slimy tactics" story.
58 posted on
10/05/2003 10:04:14 AM PDT by
RS
(nc)
To: jmstein7
Poll on the media bia needs to be FReeped.
Do you believe the major media use the news to promote a political opinon and issues they favor?
- Yes, they are very biased these days, blatantly so.44%
- No, the news outlets simply report the news. If people don't like it, it is because of their own bias. 56%
Only an idiot can say the mainstream media is not biased. Apparantly 56% are idiots.
60 posted on
10/05/2003 10:20:07 AM PDT by
BJungNan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson