1 posted on
10/04/2003 4:39:48 PM PDT by
UncleJeff
To: UncleJeff
Damn! Does this mean we don't get to bomb the Eiffel Tower?
To: UncleJeff
France said it stopped producing any type of Roland missile in 1993. "There can be no 2003 missiles since these missiles have not been made for 15 years," Chirac told reporters in Rome.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Do I detect a contradiction here?
To: All
| Aww man! Enough of the fundraiser posts!!! |
 |
| Only YOU can make fundraiser posts go away. Please contribute! |
4 posted on
10/04/2003 4:43:15 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: UncleJeff
Merde!
I was enjoying the thought of sticking one of those missiles right up Chirac's hooty snoot!
5 posted on
10/04/2003 4:43:45 PM PDT by
Ronin
(Qui tacet consentit!)
To: UncleJeff
Sorry, this is a duplicate, which I discovered just after Posting it, naturally.
6 posted on
10/04/2003 4:48:03 PM PDT by
UncleJeff
To: UncleJeff
When were they assembled?
When were they shipped?
7 posted on
10/04/2003 4:49:15 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: UncleJeff
That's OK. I beleive we have already found weapons from France that violate the UN sanctions and, I'm sure we'll find some more. You cant fault the Polish commander for blaming one of Saddam's best allies for this find.
12 posted on
10/04/2003 5:04:35 PM PDT by
capydick
("Our courage is all that stands between the enemies of civilization and of mankind.")
To: UncleJeff
Darn!
Does that mean the video images I saw earler were a fig-newton of my imagination?
13 posted on
10/04/2003 5:05:41 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: UncleJeff
You know, it would really help sheeple like my self if the WMD news sanitizers zapped these stories in utero. That conveniently keeps all the bad thoughts concerning national vulnerability and mistrust of our European allies safely out of mind. Simply changing the story after the fact just doesn't seem to cut it.
19 posted on
10/04/2003 5:32:44 PM PDT by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: UncleJeff
Prime Minister Leszek Miller met with Chirac twice to explain the mistake. Germany, France, Italy and Russia (in this order) are the main trade partners of Poland. USA is about 3%. It was a mistake :)
20 posted on
10/04/2003 5:40:49 PM PDT by
A. Pole
("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
To: UncleJeff
What do you supposed ChIraq used as leverage against the Poles to retract?
26 posted on
10/04/2003 6:18:20 PM PDT by
cardinal4
(Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
To: UncleJeff
So, France, what were the missiles, and when were they sent to Iraq? In short, what is the CORRECT information?
30 posted on
10/04/2003 6:47:08 PM PDT by
lepton
To: UncleJeff
I suppose they did not explain how the pictures of the missle name and desigation numbers and the date came to be!
Some body got the pic!??????
36 posted on
10/04/2003 7:33:46 PM PDT by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: UncleJeff
Just because they stopped making them in 93 doesnt mean they didnt sell them in 2003.
40 posted on
10/05/2003 8:02:20 PM PDT by
dinok
To: UncleJeff
I am really getting suspicious of all of these so called mistaken reports!
41 posted on
10/05/2003 8:04:43 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson