[thoughtomator]

The hypocrisy, sadly, cuts both ways. If Clinton's behavior was outrageous and unacceptable, why is Arnold's given a pass? If we give him a pass just because he's a Republican, doesn't that justify the years of stunningly craven excuse-making by the Democrats?

[nopardons]

Arnold isn't a proven serial rapist and neither has he committed perjury, nor engaged in a land swindle, sold secrets to the Chinese, coddled bin Laden, been given money from a commodities fraud, or a vast aray of other things, associated with the Clintons, which were the crux of our torrents of complaints.

Almost every sexual misconduct accusation, made against Arnold,supposedly happened when he was unmarried , not an elected official , and unproven .

Ronald Reagan carried on an adulterous affair with Nancy and impregnated her, while still married to Jane. Do you think that Reagan was craven ? Is it hypocritical for Conservatives to like and laud him ?

[BJungNan]

The hypocrisy, sadly, cuts both ways. If Clinton's behavior was outrageous and unacceptable, why is Arnold's given a pass?

Really surprised a FReeper would be so uniformed. The issue with Clinton was perjury, lying under oath in a civil sexual harrasment suit, a charge for which he was found guilty and over which he lost his law license.

You should know this if you have been paying even the least little bit of attention here.

There is a world of difference between the incident involving Clinton and the allegations against Arnold.