Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
The hypocrisy, sadly, cuts both ways. If Clinton's behavior was outrageous and unacceptable, why is Arnold's given a pass?

Really surprised a FReeper would be so uniformed. The issue with Clinton was perjury, lying under oath in a civil sexual harrasment suit, a charge for which he was found guilty and over which he lost his law license.

You should know this if you have been paying even the least little bit of attention here.

There is a world of difference between the incident involving Clinton and the allegations against Arnold.

16 posted on 10/05/2003 12:01:36 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: BJungNan
We had those issues with Clinton long before the perjury charge was apparent. Your information may start there, but I was anti-Clinton long before then. There were a lot of things that Freepers were up in arms about that had no connection whatsoever to the Jones/Lewinsky episode.

Abuse of power is the key element that drew our wrath. What we have here is every sign that Arnold will also abuse his power, and that he has a history of doing so.

Not the first time I have been one of a very few willing to say what the majority didn't want to hear.

This candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger is the polar opposite of everything this forum was meant to be. (Those things, in case you forgot: conservative, pro-constitution, anti-corruption.)
18 posted on 10/05/2003 12:08:01 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Morbidly fascinated watching RINOs worship the golden calf muscle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson