Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As a pilot, I have to say not no, but hell no, to this idea. We have enough problems in controlled airspace with saturation and now NASA wants to put something that violates the whole concept of "see and avoid" in the mix?
1 posted on 10/04/2003 6:51:36 AM PDT by Archangelsk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
Aww man! Enough of the fundraiser posts!!!
Only YOU can make fundraiser posts go away. Please contribute!

2 posted on 10/04/2003 6:53:17 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk
I'm okay with it and I fly (as a passenger) every week. These UAVs are all piloted by someone on the ground. For these vehicles I say, "What's the difference between having a pilot in the plane or on the ground?"
3 posted on 10/04/2003 6:56:08 AM PDT by BeerSwillr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk
As a pilot, I have to say not no, but hell no, to this idea.

AMEN! When ATC shows me they have a handle on piloted traffic, then I'll reconsider, but when I contstantly hear ATC make mistakes with piloted A/C I can only imagine what unpiloted A/C would add to the mix.

7 posted on 10/04/2003 7:24:57 AM PDT by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk
EXPLOIT ROBOT LABOR!
8 posted on 10/04/2003 7:27:54 AM PDT by JOE6PAK ("Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils."-Hector Berlioz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk
I wonder how long it will be until the US Military develops these as UAVs:

FYI, that's an HK (Hunter-Killer aka Human Killer) from the Terminator movies.

10 posted on 10/04/2003 7:50:06 AM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk
What's the big deal? I drive to work every morning surrounded by mindless drones.
11 posted on 10/04/2003 8:18:09 AM PDT by Redcloak (Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk

As a pilot, I have to say not no, but hell no, to this idea. We have enough problems in controlled airspace with saturation and now NASA wants to put something that violates the whole concept of "see and avoid" in the mix?

The "see-and-avoid" principle applies to highway traffic and it results in 40,000 deaths a year. If we need to have cargo moved across country I would prefer it be done by a drone at 40,000 feet under GPS guidance and computer control than by some meth-crazed trucker five feet off my bumper.

(Apologies in advance to meth-crazed truckers)

13 posted on 10/04/2003 9:48:02 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk
Yeah, these drones will actually be used on the border areas. For what? Making sure an illegal doesn't sprain his ankle without help being called in within minutes? They certainly have no intention, as they prove every day, of detering his progress north, so this must be to eleminate injury or starvation, spy on border patrol groups, and citizens.

More likely drones will eventually be airborne to watch citizens, especially if any revolution begins to forment within the Balkanized masses.
17 posted on 10/04/2003 11:13:59 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk
Is this from Terminator I, II, or III?
18 posted on 10/04/2003 11:17:05 AM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Archangelsk
I like the idea personally. But then again I love robots and new technology... more time for us to create art and music. :)
20 posted on 10/04/2003 11:52:39 AM PDT by PureSolace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson