Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh won't be prosecuted, attorneys wager
PalmBeachPost.com ^ | Saturday, October 4, 2003 | John Pacenti

Posted on 10/04/2003 1:42:29 AM PDT by Walkin Man

Saturday, October 4

Limbaugh won't be prosecuted, attorneys wager

By John Pacenti, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer Saturday, October 4, 2003

WEST PALM BEACH -- Rush Limbaugh's alleged addiction to painkillers may be documented in e-mails.

His reported drug deals may have been taped by his former housekeeper.

And the talkative maid and her handyman husband could even be willing to testify against the conservative talk-show host. They sure were willing to spill everything to a supermarket tabloid.

But the chance of criminal charges ever being filed against Limbaugh is next to nil, say criminal defense attorneys who have handled numerous drug cases.

And some local lawyers say they are hearing from sources within State Attorney Barry Krischer's office that Limbaugh -- who lives in a $24 million mansion on Palm Beach -- will indeed not be charged.

Sources also said Limbaugh won't even be questioned by law enforcement officials, unless the commentator chooses to cooperate on his own.

Roy Black is the Miami powerhouse attorney Limbaugh has reportedly hired to represent him. But Black, who has represented such celebrities as Marv Albert and William Kennedy Smith, won't return calls to confirm he has been retained. And Limbaugh said on his radio show Friday he wasn't at liberty to address the allegations.

James Martz, the prosecutor who heads up a task force on money-laundering, said he is more interested in finding the heads of such distribution cells as opposed to prosecuting low-level drug users -- whether they are celebrities or not.

Plus, to prosecute drug abusers, authorities need to catch them in possession of the illegal substance, he said. "Shy of that, we have very little leverage in the state system," Martz said.

What it all comes down to, attorneys say, is that the court of public opinion is a far cry from the court of law.

"I think that the state better have a heck of a lot more than what I'm seeing, hearing and reading right now," attorney Michael Salnick said. "First of all you have a major credibility issue with these witnesses. The credibility issue starts with the fact they sold their story to The National Enquirer."

The former maid, Wilma Cline, and her husband, David Cline, told The Enquirer for its latest edition that Limbaugh bulldogged them into supplying him with thousands of painkillers between 1998 and 2002. They said Limbaugh took hydrocodone, Lorcet and OxyContin.

The story came out on the heels of Limbaugh resigning from his job as an ESPN sports analyst after he said Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb was overrated because the media wanted a black quarterback to succeed.

Maid said she taped transactions

It is unknown if the timing was coincidental, but The Enquirer's story is full of juicy details. According to the piece, it all started when Limbaugh asked for some extra pain pills from David Cline's legitimate prescription for a back injury.

Soon, Limbaugh demanded that they continue to supply him with pills when the prescription ran out. That's when Wilma Cline started keeping a log of her deliveries and preserved desperate e-mails from Limbaugh in which he referred to pills as "small blue babies."

Wilma Cline said she would meet Limbaugh in parking lots, passing a cigar box filled with pills through his Mercedes' window.

During her two last drug deliveries, Wilma Cline told The Enquirer, she secretly audiotaped the transactions.

Late last year, the Clines went to prosectors, who gave them immunity. Sources say the couple helped prosecutors in their investigation into tracking some 450,000 pills of hydrocodone back to the source.

Authorities believe some of Limbaugh's supply was dispensed from a small suburban Lake Worth pharmacy, World Health Association. The couple that ran the operation, Gloria and Louis Beshara, were arrested in May, seven months after the Clines came forward. The Besharas currently face trafficking charges.

Also, what could undermine the Clines' credibility is that David Cline has a criminal history.

He was arrested in 1982 in Collier County for cocaine trafficking, serving five years in prison. In 2000, he was arrested on charges of identity theft -- using the name George Earl Taylor -- of possessing a fake driver license and fake vehicle registration, as well as possession of marijuana and resisting arrest. He served 18 months probation.

It is unknown if the couple received full immunity from prosecutors for information they gave about how they provided pills for Limbaugh.

If Wilma Cline did tape Limbaugh without his knowledge, that is a third-degree felony punishable by up to five years in prison, attorneys say.

Plus, Martz said such tapings can't even be heard by prosecutors. As for e-mail evidence, Martz said any such evidence is problematic because there is trouble verifying who sent the e-mail.

So where does this leave Limbaugh's criminal liability?

"I think it's legal suicide to go after a guy like Limbaugh with evidence as flimsy as this," Salnick said.

Two former prosecutors, now in private practice, agree.

Robert Gershman said most of the time, users are prosecuted only for possession. He said the Clines probably wouldn't have even gotten in the door of the state attorney's office if they weren't outing a celebrity.

Marc Shiner said the celebrity issue taints the case. "Why would drug dealers turn in their client unless they are trying to save their own neck -- or trying to make a couple hundred thousand dollars peddling their story to the tabloids?" he asked.

"If I was Roy Black, I'd be sitting on the beach right now sipping a pina colada or watching a Marlins game and not worrying too much about Rush Limbaugh's criminal liability right now."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: pilingon; rushbashing; rushlimbaugh; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last
To: Walkin Man
Let's see - do I believe trailer park trash that has been convicted of cocaine, or do I believe Rush Limbaugh?
Hmmmmm...now *that* is a tough one!
21 posted on 10/04/2003 2:36:49 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
Sorry to disappoint you but I am sick of pompous asses like Rush who lord their wealth and privilege over everyone and get to play with a different set of rules.

Rush has had zero tolerance for drug abusers in the past and has excoriated trial lawyers as well.

Now he retains them to defend himself against drug charges!

You don't see the irony in that, not to mention the hypocrisy?

Rush has been very careful not to deny these charges too so that makes me think there is something to them, not just the story from the maid.

22 posted on 10/04/2003 2:39:36 AM PDT by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
One or two threads about unsubstantiated gossip (until there are charges there is no offense) may be tolerable but 80+ threads and starting up a bunch more to wage class envy is trolling.

There are more important matters at hand like the French made missiles located in Iraq (A HREF="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/994679/posts">Polish troops find new French missiles in Iraq") and there is this story that has run under several headlines: BREAKING?: 60 Million In Biological Warheads, Chemical Arms en Route to Europe Snagged

Keep on your little drug war rant. Light up your spliff and feel "relevant".

23 posted on 10/04/2003 2:40:38 AM PDT by weegee ((I just wanted another excuse to use this picture...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
Is a defense attorney a "trial lawyer"? Or is an ambulance chaser a "trial lawyer"? All legal actions may need to go before to court to be resolved, that would require a "trial". Where do YOU draw the line on what a "trial lawyer" is?
24 posted on 10/04/2003 2:43:11 AM PDT by weegee ((I just wanted another excuse to use this picture...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
Now he retains them to defend himself against drug charges!

Hmmmm....who else would he retain? The milkman? A supermodel with braces? Or maybe a put a monkey in a suit and give him a cute little briefcase...

Of course he's going to hire the best lawyer around for defending a high-profile media circus case. But then, he could always try to defend himself - but that might be arrogant.

25 posted on 10/04/2003 2:45:35 AM PDT by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
"The claims against Limbaugh are bogus He's a great American"

I agree, the claims are purely made up. Rush is not saying any thing right now. He is waiting to see what the National Enquirer is going to publish about him.

If, they publish what this Wilma Cline has said, Rush will own the Enquirer when this is over.

It can all be traced back to the DNC. Clinton.

26 posted on 10/04/2003 2:47:21 AM PDT by auggy (http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ophiucus
Too much of this story smells. If she was the maid, why not bring the pills directly to the house. No need for parking lot transfers.

And 100 pills a day? In a 16 hour day that is a bit over 6 an hour. With pre show prep and his three hour show (figure 4-6 hours- that is 24-36 pills!), there are lots of people who can testify to any use.
27 posted on 10/04/2003 2:50:19 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KeyWest
He wouldn't be able to survive that many pills in a day, or at least he'd be extremely ill. That's O.D. and DOA dosage.
28 posted on 10/04/2003 2:55:55 AM PDT by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
The claims against Limbaugh are bogus

He has had numerous chances to deny them yet he has not. Not the actions of an innocent man. If I was accused of this and it was untrue I'd certainly deny it.

29 posted on 10/04/2003 2:58:13 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man
Have you seen actual, for real charges against Limbaugh by the authorities or are you talking about charges "discussed" in the media?
30 posted on 10/04/2003 3:30:48 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: auggy
I agree, the claims are purely made up. Rush is not saying any thing right now. He is waiting to see what the National Enquirer is going to publish about him.

Mr. Limbaugh is not under arrest but what he says (and is recorded/transcribed) could be used against him in a court of law. Art Bell dropped off the airwaves when he fought phoney charges. It is always best to remain silent on pending legal matters and let an attorney speak for you.

31 posted on 10/04/2003 3:34:18 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: auggy
Rush isn't the only one who is "strangely" silent right now. I can understand why he is, because his own investigators need to find out who is behind this. Sounds like a celebrity setup to me. Rush had a ligitimate prescription for a small amount of pills and these criminals used his name to buy thousands, which they used/sold themselves.

But where are the Clintons on all this? Why aren't they rejoicing and condemning Rush in front of thousands of TV cameras? Why am I not hearing their opinions on this on the radio? They've been after Rush for years. Now when it seems he's in trouble, they just strangely clam up? Does anyone have a link to a comment by the Clintons on this?


32 posted on 10/04/2003 3:43:36 AM PDT by mesmerini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
Since she worked for Rush, why would she need to meet him in parking lots in areas where his Mercedes would stick out like a sore thumb? She could have just brought the stuff to work i.e his mansion with her.

She says she supplied 11,900 pills in 6 months...that's 66 narcotic mind numbing pills per day....The more details we get the more this story stinks to high heaven.

33 posted on 10/04/2003 3:48:07 AM PDT by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mesmerini
Very, very interesting observation.
34 posted on 10/04/2003 3:52:45 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: auggy
I agree, the claims are purely made up. Rush is not saying any thing right now. He is waiting to see what the National Enquirer is going to publish about him.

The story has already been published. Newspapers across the country are quoting from it. It's been on the network news and cable TV has been screaming about it. How much worse could it get?

If, they publish what this Wilma Cline has said, Rush will own the Enquirer when this is over.

It's already been published. However, with a public figure like Rush to win a libel suit, there's a very high threshold to surmount. And the National Enquirer would delight in deposing Rush and publishing quotes from the depositions in their rag.

35 posted on 10/04/2003 4:19:23 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Is a defense attorney a "trial lawyer"?

A defense attorney is a trial lawyer, by definition.

36 posted on 10/04/2003 4:20:44 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GailA
Since she worked for Rush, why would she need to meet him in parking lots in areas where his Mercedes would stick out like a sore thumb? She could have just brought the stuff to work i.e his mansion with her.

Well observed.

She says she supplied 11,900 pills in 6 months...that's 66 narcotic mind numbing pills per day....

Not fishy. He could have been laying in a supply.

37 posted on 10/04/2003 4:22:50 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sakic
He has had numerous chances to deny them yet he has not. Not the actions of an innocent man. If I was accused of this and it was untrue I'd certainly deny it.

No you wouldn't. Not if you had a competant attorney.

38 posted on 10/04/2003 4:23:49 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
"( and no, I'm NOT s drooling sycophant of his and don't even listen to his show)"
WHY NOT?? ;-))
39 posted on 10/04/2003 4:35:31 AM PDT by ch53gunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mesmerini
The Clintons are silent on Ah nold, too. And Wilson. Gee, imagine them ALL coming out at the same time. Of course, Davis did a little speaking out. I guess everyone forgot that he harbored Condit when Condit was being investigated.

Ah nolds ALLEGED groping happened years ago. The Enquirer had the story on Rush two years ago (and I'm sure the Clines would have been paid then), and the "supposed" explosive article on Wilson was in July.

It sure dampened the Kay news and any comments on the President. And anyone that thinks that the UN Policy ended Saddam's efforts at WMD is an idiot. It is what he does and a master of deceit. The entire world gives him credit for that.

The Dems are busy!!

40 posted on 10/04/2003 4:40:47 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson