To: Saundra Duffy
I do not believe I have heard a single Republican supporter of Mr. Scharzenegger declare that he is the best qualified candidate or the preferred choice; only that he is the most electable.Actually many Schartzenegger supporters believe that he will be able to better build a consensus to govern. Tom McClintock has never shown a willingness to compromise and that will be needed when faced with so many demonRATS in the state legislator. That said, I do believe that Tom would make a fine governor and would vote for him if Arnold was not in the race.
8 posted on
10/03/2003 12:54:04 PM PDT by
w1andsodidwe
(recycling is a waste of time for hardworking taxpayers, hire the homeless to sort garbage)
To: w1andsodidwe
Your vote for Arnold is a vote for the Kennedy's to run California. Not for me. Arnold is not a Republican.
McClintock is a proven leader.
10 posted on
10/03/2003 12:57:39 PM PDT by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: w1andsodidwe
I do believe that Tom would make a fine governor and would vote for him if Arnold was not in the race.Didn't you read the article? Sheeeeesh.
38 posted on
10/03/2003 1:37:35 PM PDT by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: w1andsodidwe
"That said, I do believe that Tom would make a fine governor and would vote for him if Arnold was not in the race."
If this were a primary fight, McClintock would be bringing Arnold down right now. But with the election cycle so short, I think McClintock supporters ought to be proud of bringing him up as far as they did in such a short period of time, but his support will vanish as the election nears. Sad but true. The reason is, Arnold might win even if McClintock stays. But so long as Arnold stays, McClintock can't. It's too short a time line.
McClintock might be wise to bow out while he's still strong.
Sad FReegards....
89 posted on
10/03/2003 2:57:16 PM PDT by
Arthur Wildfire! March
([California is in danger of being tomorrow's Kosovo.])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson