Skip to comments.
LA Times's Agenda Revealed: Keep Yesterday's "Grope" Story on Front Page for Second Day
LA Times ^
Posted on 10/03/2003 12:36:33 PM PDT by GulliverSwift
On their front page, they've done the unprecedented step of keeping the same headline for two days. On the front page it says, "Women Say Schwarzenegger Groped Them," and the story is the same as yesterday, and dated from yesterday.
Why would they do this? .. . . . . . . do I have to ask?
They're on Gray Devil's pay role.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arnold; bias; california; latimes; mediabias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: GulliverSwift
It'll probably be the headline on all of their editions until Wednesday morning...
Smells like desperation.
2
posted on
10/03/2003 12:38:20 PM PDT
by
Allegra
To: GulliverSwift
LA Times agenda exposed...again, again, and again.
This time though, it is so blantently obvious that people are now seeing the truth about their bias. This could be the best thing the LA Times could do, to discredit itself.
3
posted on
10/03/2003 12:39:12 PM PDT
by
Simmy2.5
To: GulliverSwift
On their front page, they've done the unprecedented step of keeping the same headline for two days. On the front page it says, "Women Say Schwarzenegger Groped Them," and the story is the same as yesterday, and dated from yesterday. Why would they do this? .. . . . . . . do I have to ask?
Because that's all the Times has on Arnold.
|
4
posted on
10/03/2003 12:39:59 PM PDT
by
Sabertooth
(No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
To: All
DANG FREEPERS KEPT ME FROM BECOMING THE WORLD'S GREEN KING!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
5
posted on
10/03/2003 12:40:55 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: GulliverSwift
Here's the Recall section on the front page, for the record. I don't think reproducing these headlines here violates FR policy regarding the LAT. Note that they manage to put a negative slant on ALL THREE of the stories about Arnold:
6
posted on
10/03/2003 12:43:15 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Allegra
Smells like desperation.Smells like...victory.
7
posted on
10/03/2003 12:44:21 PM PDT
by
kevao
(Fuques France!)
To: GulliverSwift
The LA Times working with the Davis campaign.
8
posted on
10/03/2003 12:45:27 PM PDT
by
Tempest
To: GulliverSwift; Sabertooth
To: GulliverSwift
Why would they do this? .. . . . . . . do I have to ask?
They'll take it off when they realize its boosting Arnold's poll numbers.
10
posted on
10/03/2003 12:47:30 PM PDT
by
BOBTHENAILER
(One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
To: GulliverSwift
You do not have to ask.
11
posted on
10/03/2003 12:48:00 PM PDT
by
CyberCowboy777
(Have you ever heard of Plato? Aristotle? Socrates? - - Morons.)
To: GulliverSwift
"L.A. TIMES GROPES CALIFORNIA RECALL"
Editor claims; "Davis made him do it"!
12
posted on
10/03/2003 12:50:26 PM PDT
by
elbucko
To: elbucko
LOL!!!
13
posted on
10/03/2003 12:54:25 PM PDT
by
Tempest
To: GulliverSwift
Next big story: Arnold is the product of Nazi eugenics.
[Can't take credit, heard it elsewhere. Can't remember who]
14
posted on
10/03/2003 12:55:01 PM PDT
by
dinasour
To: GulliverSwift
Too bad the LA Times couldn't have displayed the same attitude towards Bubba Clintoon and Bob Packwood rather than turn the paper's back with a "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil." Neither jerks would have survived politically very long.
To: GulliverSwift
The LA TImes really needs to stop exposing itself in public.
16
posted on
10/03/2003 1:06:59 PM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
("We hang petty thieves, we elevate the great ones to public office." Aesop, 600BC)
To: GulliverSwift
Take a look at the Bustamonte article right below it on the front page. It almost reads like something bought and paid for by the Bustamonte campaign. It's something that belongs on the opinion pages not the news pages. The contrast in tone is amazing. Reading the article about Bustamonte makes me believe that the LA Times has now tossed in the towel in their effort to stop the recall and have now started to throw their support behind Bustamonte. Time will tell.
Also the article you mention is only one of several attacking Arnold in the current edition.
17
posted on
10/03/2003 1:48:09 PM PDT
by
airedale
To: GulliverSwift
Click on the LA Times sight above and go to the editorial page. They have one of the most viscous and ugly smear pieces on Arnold, the likes of which I have ever seen. The Dems and their media puppets are truly desperate and despicable.
To: Sabertooth
Because that's all the Times has on Arnold. I was earlier thinking 'Is that the best they can do?'. This is a clear indication that Davis and company has lost it. They can't even dig up decent dirt any more.
19
posted on
10/03/2003 2:45:14 PM PDT
by
nosofar
To: dinasour
Apple-Pie Eugenics
War Against the Weak
http://www.pfm.org/BPtemplate.cfm?Section=BreakPoint_Home&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=10517 BreakPoint with Charles Colson
October 2, 2003
See if you can guess the source of this quote. It is better for all the world
[if] society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind
Three generations of imbeciles is enough.
If you think that this quote came from a Nazi document, youre wrong. Its from Oliver Wendell Holmess 1927 majority opinion in Buck v. Bell that upheld a Virginia law mandating the sterilization of the feebleminded.
Twenty years later, Holmess words were thrown back in our face by Nazi defendants in the Nuremberg trials. You see, while the Nazis worst crimes may have ended at Auschwitz, they began on Long Island .
Thats the conclusion of a new book, War against the Weak: Eugenics and Americas Campaign to Create a Master Race written by Edwin Black, who contends that American corporate philanthropies helped found and fund the Nazi eugenics of Hitler and Mengele.
Eugenics, which literally means good birth, originally referred to the use of selective breeding to improve the human race. Of course, what was meant by improve reflected the racism and bigotry of the eugenicists. Blacks, Jews, Eastern and Southern Europeans, the retarded, and even people with brown hair were the targets of the improvers.
Thus, between 1900 and the mid-sixties, hundreds of thousands of Americans
were not permitted to continue their families by reproducing. Black compares it to ethnic cleansing, and hes right.
The tools of American eugenics included forcible sterilization, commitment to mental institutions, prohibitions against marriage, and even dissolution of already existing marriages. One Michigan legislator went so far as to introduce a bill calling for the electrocution of severely retarded infants.
Eventually, American eugenics, with help from the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation, Margaret Sanger, and others, found its way to Germany. While Nazi eugenics quickly outpaced American eugenics in both velocity and ferocity, Black writes, the connection between the two was never lost. As one American eugenicist told the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the Germans are beating us at our own game.
The Holocaust and other crimes of the Third Reich made eugenics a bad word, and the American connection was quickly swept under the rug. But the attempt to play God never really stopped.
Today it takes the form of human genomic science and corporate globalization. Instead of racist declarations, we have polished PR campaigns that hold out the promises of biotech: miracle cures and ever-increasing life expectancies.
While the word eugenics is never used, thats what it is. We are intent on eliminating imperfection from the gene pool. Even today, children whose deformities are discovered in utero are rarely permitted to be born. And as genetic technology improves, the list of those whom Black calls the never-born will continue to expand.
If the abolition of man is to be stopped, this story must be told. Christians need to pull the truth about eugenics out from underneath the rug and hold it up as a reminder of where playing God leads us. Six decades of denial is enough.
20
posted on
10/03/2003 3:24:43 PM PDT
by
Maria S
(“I know a little bit about how White Houses work.” Hillary Clinton, 8/26/03)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson