To be honest I don't remember the specifics of your posts in August. Were they more generalized or did you have names and specifics? I just don't recall.
If they were generalized I don't know exactly how to deal with them. If they did have specifics, I'm still faced with the reality that nobody filed charges, or the things he did didn't reach the level of criminality.
I've always dispised men who acted the way this guy is described as acting. In my experience in life though, the women generally make noise about these guys, then forgive and forget and choose them over the nice guys. There's something about that bad-boy thing that women really go for. I've seen this happen countless times with single women into their early thirties. What am I supposed to make of that?
Now I don't say this happens in all cases, but enough to really screw with the minds of young men who try to treat women with respect, only to lose out to these a--holes in direct competition.
What I have to deal with now is whether the public is going to buy into these reports. If they don't, I'm still faced with either supporting him or just turning the keys over to Bustamante.
I know you guys disagree with me, but I am not convinced Tom could have beaten Cruz in a head to head match-up. There have been articles and posts proposing that on the forum. I've never seen a credible presentation that took all things into consideration and revealed it was possible.
Here's some examples of what was posted back then:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/973370/posts http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/973398/posts http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/973494/posts If you have the stomach to read them, you will see that many of the Slimes charges are actually nothing more than a regurgitation of these old charges.
The fact is that women quite often go for the "brutes". Look at how infatuated the Feminazi hags were with Clinton. I bet many of the women complaining about Arnold now enjoyed it then, and it was consensual. I am sure others coming forward are just making it up in a stampede of "copycat" allegations (one accuser was verified to be a member of a Marxist Feminazi group called "Code Pink"). And I am sure he was a damn pig with others. It is impossible to sort out what's true and not true, but as Arnold states "where there's smoke, there's fire"...
Maybe Tom didn't have a chance. WHO knows... but Peter Ueberroth certainly had a chance without Arnold in the race. The Slimes' decision to bring this out at the 11th really is a stab in the eye of the voters.
Bustamecha is no longer a factor in this. At this point, it is either Arnold or Davis. At least that's how it appears by all accounts. Tom will get 10 to 15% On the other hand, 10 to 15% of the "no" voters won't vote for a replacement. I think that cancels things out.
Bottom line is that this last minute Puke Politics needs to be repudiated. All of the last minute sliming, especially on Hitler, has actually made me consider switching to Arnold for the first time since this race began.