Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jorsett
I would have thought that at a gathering of conservatives, .....

Stupid L.A. Times. Arnold's groupies are not conservatives. They're a bunch of Liberals like....well....like Bill Clinton groupies.

But, if this isn't proof that the Times's main goal is to do harm to conservatives then nothing is.

7 posted on 10/03/2003 7:01:49 AM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Eagle
If you believe all the smears, then you would have to believe that Arnold is a storm trooper in disguise. Which, if you believe them, would lead to an interesting conclusion about who is the real conservative in this race.
13 posted on 10/03/2003 7:08:11 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Eagle
There is also the fact that the Clinton scandals were not serious because of sex. They were serious because they involved serious dishonesty and abuse of power.

You can tell Democrats this again and again, but most of them will continue to believe their own propaganda that it was just about seedy sex.

I guess we should be glad that Democrats believe their own propaganda so often. After all, believing that W is an inept moron who just got into Harvard Business School through family connections means they underestimate him to their own detriment.

14 posted on 10/03/2003 7:08:47 AM PDT by Montfort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Eagle
Oh, please. I'm really getting tired of your suckers. See below.
21 posted on 10/03/2003 7:22:59 AM PDT by Hildy (SUCKER: Short-sighted Uncompromising Conservative Kool-Aid-drinking Elitist Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Eagle
"Arnold's groupies are not conservatives. They're a bunch of Liberals"
baloney....
55 posted on 10/03/2003 6:21:45 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert... the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Eagle
Some of us there ARE conservatives. Now why do you suppose Steve Lopez, a Los Angeles Times liberal columnist sees a problem with conservatives gathering anywhere? Why is that an issue with him? I mean we don't have freedom of speech. But I see liberals do. They can slime us in their newspapers and we have to sit there and take it. Its funny how Lopez accuses Arnold and his supporters of being judgmental and throwing bricks at the Fourth Estate. Apparently the LAT can dish it out but they can't take it. Liberals don't want to meet us in the arena of ideas - they'd rather change the subject. Lopez threw in a zinger in accusing Arnold of not wanting to discuss the issues of concern to California but he overlooks the fact its his newspaper that's lowered itself to tabloid status in splashing a story about gropers on its front pages two days in a row. Talk about the Left being populated with Ken Starr wannabes.
73 posted on 10/03/2003 8:19:23 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson