Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bigeasy_70118
Assuming that Rush was using those pills (I don't believe it was 100 per day) is there a chance it all started with taking some sort of prescribed weight loss drugs and then went on from there? Remember, Rush did lose over 100 pounds. It might have been because of better diet but perhaps weight loss drugs were also used.
437 posted on 10/03/2003 9:31:29 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (A Stitch In Time Won't Save You A Dime But At Least It Makes This Dopey Saying Rhyme.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies ]


To: PJ-Comix
Assuming that Rush was using those pills (I don't believe it was 100 per day) is there a chance it all started with taking some sort of prescribed weight loss drugs and then went on from there? Remember, Rush did lose over 100 pounds. It might have been because of better diet but perhaps weight loss drugs were also used.

The problem is that weight-loss drugs are the "opposite" of the kind he's being accused of being addicted to. In short, weight-loss drugs are "uppers", pain-killers are "downers".

If he were accused of being addicted to *amphetamines* or some related drug, then the weight-loss connection could make sense. But painkillers, if anything, will make you *gain* wait because you'll be loafing around a lot.

1,041 posted on 10/03/2003 5:24:51 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson