Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagle Eye
That would be a net increase. I'm sure you meant to multiply by 75%.

No, I didn't. The poster claimed 20 million listeners. I don't believe that number, but it is quite beside the point. It will be sliced (cut) by a huge amount if he turns out to be a druggie.

So what if Rush was an addict?

It makes him a hypocrite and destroys his credibility.

IOW, whose business is it of anyone elses what kind and what amount of medication Rush took or takes?

Medication? LOL. Nice try.

But your other point is right on. EXCEPT for one thing, Rush disagrees. He says it's everyone elses business. He advocates jail for illegal drug users.

29 posted on 10/03/2003 8:35:22 AM PDT by Protagoras (The only thing worse than drugs is the war on drugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Protagoras
If you "slice" a pie, you divide it. When you divide a number, ie, 20 million, by a fraction, you end up with a net increase. Simple arithmetic.

The 'legality' of a substance does not negate it being a medication. If you give a friend or spouse one of your prescribed pills does it then is it no longer a medication because they are taking it without government approval?

And that goes back to my point that the government shouldn't be in the position to determine what medications a person takes.

Why would YOU no longer believe Rush if you found out he became addicted to painkillers? He's not the first, nor will he be the last person to do so. It's a medical condition, not a character flaw.

30 posted on 10/03/2003 8:51:58 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (I'm a RINO. I'm far too conservative to be a real Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson