Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palm Beach Post - Limbaugh linked to painkillers
PalmBeachPost.com ^ | October 3, 2003 | John Pacenti and Mary McLachlin

Posted on 10/03/2003 12:31:25 AM PDT by HAL9000

WEST PALM BEACH -- A former housekeeper for Rush Limbaugh claims she supplied the conservative commentator with thousands of doses of painkillers, some of which may have come from a mom-and-pop pill mill busted earlier this year in Lake Worth.

The housekeeper and her husband, residents of The Acreage, told their story to a Miami lawyer, and then to the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office after a promise of immunity from prosecution. Then they sold the tale to The National Enquirer, which splashed the allegations across their front page in Thursday's edition under the headline: "Rush Limbaugh Caught In Drug Ring."

Whether State Attorney Barry Krischer is interested in prosecuting Limbaugh isn't known. But prosecutors rarely pursue drug addicts unless they catch them with drugs. The Enquirer story stopped short of saying Limbaugh was caught red-handed.

Krischer's office would neither confirm nor deny the allegations Thursday. But sources said prosecutors would not be surprised if Limbaugh contacted them.

Limbaugh, 52, wasn't talking, either, but he was communicating with powerhouse criminal defense attorney Roy Black of Miami, who had no comment.

Limbaugh, in a statement posted on his radio show's Web site, said: "I am unaware of any investigation by any authorities involving me. No governmental representative has contacted me directly or indirectly. If my assistance is required in the future, I will, of course, cooperate fully."

Limbaugh wasn't on the air Thursday. Instead he gave the keynote speech at the National Association of Broadcasters convention in Philadelphia. He made no mention of the drug allegations, but focused instead on his resignation as an ESPN sports analyst late Wednesday.

He gave up the job three days after saying on the sports network's Sunday NFL Countdown that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb was overrated because the media wanted to see a black quarterback succeed.

The sources for the Enquirer's exposé were former housekeeper Wilma Cline, 42, and her husband, David, 41, who claim they were Limbaugh's drug suppliers from 1998 to 2002 and that he paid them tens of thousands of dollars.

They said they sold him 11,900 tablets over six months in 2001. Many exchanges of drugs and money took place at a Denny's restaurant parking lot on Belvedere Road, they alleged.

Trail leads to pharmacy

The Enquirer story said the couple got nervous and contacted Edward Shohat, a noted Miami criminal defense lawyer. Late last year, Shohat escorted them to Palm Beach County prosecutor James Martz.

Given immunity, the Clines became part of a drug probe that led to the arrest of Louis and Gloria Beshara last May. Authorities believe that the Clines' illegal supply of painkillers came from the Besharas.

Investigators tracked 450,000 doses of the powerful narcotic painkiller hydrocodone that were dispensed at the Besharas' small pharmacy, World Health Association, in suburban Lake Worth. The Besharas were charged with trafficking and conspiracy to traffic in hydrocodone, a painkiller similar to morphine.

During a six-month undercover operation, law enforcement agents from the multi-agency task force also seized 73,000 narcotic tablets from the Besharas' home in Loxahatchee and from the pharmacy, and unearthed $806,000 in cash.

Louis Beshara's attorney, James Eisenberg, told The Post he knew of no connection between the Clines and the Besharas.

"Those names (the Clines) have never come up. Never," Eisenberg said. "There is nothing in the case about Limbaugh, about the Clines, about anything like that. There is no connection as far as I can tell."

Court documents show as many as four confidential informants were involved in the Beshara case, but Eisenberg said he didn't believe they included Wilma or David Cline.

The Enquirer said the Clines backed up their claim of being Limbaugh's drug suppliers by providing e-mails that Limbaugh allegedly sent them with such messages as, "You know how this stuff works... the more you get used to, the more it takes."

The messages also mention "small blue babies," an apparent reference to the painkillers.

According to Wilma Cline's story, Limbaugh's descent into drug addiction happened after she told him that her husband was hurt in a fall from a ladder and that he was taking some hydrocodone.

"To my astonishment, he said, 'Can you spare a couple of them?' " she told the Enquirer.

She said David Cline was impressed by who Limbaugh was and gave him 10 pills from his prescription.

The next day in the laundry room of Limbaugh's $24 million mansion, he asked his $370-a-week housekeeper for more pills, Wilma Cline told the tabloid. Soon, she said, the couple was supplying Limbaugh with 80 pills a month.

When her husband's doctor stopped prescribing him painkillers, she said, Limbaugh got upset and yelled at her, "I don't care how or what you do but you'd better -- better! -- get me some more."

With the help of an unnamed houseman, she said, she continued to supply Limbaugh illegally, hiding the pills under his mattress so his wife wouldn't find them. Several months later, Limbaugh told her he would be undergoing drug rehabilitation and wouldn't need the drugs.

But one month later, Limbaugh called and asked if he could get an even more powerful painkiller: OxyContin, Wilma Cline told the Enquirer.

She started to keep a log of her purchases, she said, and within the first 47 days she delivered 4,350 pills to Limbaugh.

She said Limbaugh became increasingly paranoid, one time groping her to see whether she was wearing a wire for the authorities.

He tried to kick his habit again at a New York hospital to no avail, she said, and piled up drug bills of $80,000.

In 2002, Wilma Cline said, a Palm Beach attorney showed up on her doorstep, gave her a check for $100,000 and made her sign a promissory note, but said the "loan" would never be collected. Four months later, in November, the attorney gave her a check for $100,000 and told her not to give Limbaugh any more pills.

The attorney also told her to hand over the computer retaining Limbaugh's e-mails, Wilma Cline said, but she took the hard drive from another computer and smashed it in front of him. Then the Clines sought legal help.

Enquirer Editor-in-Chief David Perel declined to say whether the Clines were paid for their story, but said the tabloid does pay for interviews. The Clines could not be reached Thursday.

David Cline was arrested for cocaine trafficking in 1982 in Collier County. He posted bond to get out of jail and then skipped, living as a fugitive in New York and Fort Lauderdale under different names until surrendering in 1989. He was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison.

In April 2000, while he and his wife were allegedly supplying Limbaugh with drugs, Cline was arrested in Palm Beach County and charged with identity theft, having a counterfeit or stolen driver license and a false vehicle registration, possessing marijuana and resisting arrest. He wound up with a combined sentence of time served, 18 months probation, community service and court costs.

The injury that put a hydrocodone prescription into David Cline's hands happened in March 1998, while he was doing odd jobs at the Palm Beach home of Patricia Bradshaw.

A pull-down attic ladder broke, sending him crashing to the floor. The Clines sued Bradshaw for $75,000, but Circuit Judge Jorge Labarga ruled against them in January 2001.

Under questioning by Bradshaw's lawyer, Cline said he had made $40,000 to $50,000 a year and that he had not filed any income tax returns for the preceding five years. He also said he had used an alias to avoid paying child support for two children from a previous marriage.

The Clines live at the end of a dirt road, where some of the 2-acre lots are fenced, with locked gates and "No Trespassing" and "Beware of Dog" signs.

Their house is a 10-minute drive from where Louis and Gloria Beshara live in the Fox Trails community near Lion Country Safari. Their Besharas' house is surrounded by a high stone wall.

Crews from CNN and the NBC network joined local reporters in a stakeout on the road in front of the Clines' yard Thursday. Scott and Cathy Pauldino, who live across the street, said the Clines had always been helpful and neighborly in their five years as neighbors.

"They're good people," Cathy Pauldino said.

Limbaugh called good boss

Wilma Cline had told them Limbaugh was a good person to work for, but revealed no details about the commentator's personal life.

Limbaugh's friends also defended him.

Advertising executive Dina Sontag, who worked with Limbaugh from 1993 to 1996, said she never saw Limbaugh take any drugs.

"As far as I know, it's all ludicrous," she said.

Limbaugh's fill-in host on Thursday, Sacramento broadcaster Tom Sullivan, alluded briefly to the fact that "Rush is in the headlines today."

"Nobody better to talk about Rush than Rush," Sullivan said at the beginning of the three-hour broadcast. "And when he gets back, he will, I'm sure, delve into all of the news about him as he always does."



TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: barrykrischer; davidcline; edshohat; gloriabeshara; jamesmartz; limbaugh; louisbeshara; royblack; rushlimbaugh; wilmacline
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-183 next last
To: WorkingClassFilth
Oh, I think the combatants are far more basic than Marxism vs Democracy.
81 posted on 10/03/2003 11:50:26 PM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
You have two people who approached a lawyer before going to the cops. That sounds legit. Then they finger Rush as the customer and the pharmacy as their supplier, and the pharmacy does turn out to be selling drugs illegally. You have confirmation of half the story there. Then you have no denial from Rush. That doesn't look good.

But a man of Rush's age to suddenly decide to take up perscription drug abuse is just bizzare. And, as everybody else has pointed out, so is the volume.
82 posted on 10/04/2003 12:33:17 AM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_dmc
I just love finding out the source of words.

Then you'll enjoy this.

Online Etymology Dictionary

I've spent many an hour just randomly exploring. He has some good essays in the "Sciolist" section too.

83 posted on 10/04/2003 12:40:41 AM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Cacophonous
Would you prosecute someone who broke the law?

Is there a victim? Is he a danger to others?

The law should be used to protect the peace, not to persecute harmless individuals.

We have too many people in prison for victimless crimes in this country. Do you believe that these people will leave prison a better person?
84 posted on 10/04/2003 1:12:12 AM PDT by LittleJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
But how will you feel if you hear the tapes and they are incriminating whether admissable or not?

The political fallout from this has never hinged on criminal prosecution. It hinges on credibility that will be damaged if these claims are substantiated.

I did not find Rush's non-deniability today comforting.

"No, I did not buy nearly 12-24 jugs of illegal narcotic pills from my maid as she alleges" would have sounded a whole lot better than...."when I know what I'm up against I'll come clean or ...."you'll all know more than maybe you ever wanted to"....

It sounded to me like "I'll tell yall what I know when I know what they've got on me".

Not good to me.

Now , everybody is going to go and rationalize away whatever "it" may be. Unless "it" is a complete refutation of a fabrication by these clowns then Rush has a problem....and criminal charges are not the main worry. His image and credibility will be damaged to all but his diehards and the left will never let this go. Fair or not.
85 posted on 10/04/2003 2:30:55 AM PDT by wardaddy (The Lizard King it was.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Bayou City
Pizzi bump.
86 posted on 10/04/2003 4:18:50 AM PDT by snopercod (Once, I built a railroad...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MattAMiller
Awesome! Thank U.
87 posted on 10/04/2003 4:33:52 AM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus
Really, would you let that within 100 meters of anything YOU were gonna eat? ;-)
88 posted on 10/04/2003 4:39:23 AM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: radiohead
It is possible that the maid was a temp.
89 posted on 10/04/2003 4:40:05 AM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Well...he did say, "Trust me", so I will. Guess that makes me a diehard.

It's a given that his lawyer instructed him not to say anything about the case on the air.

90 posted on 10/04/2003 4:40:39 AM PDT by snopercod (Once, I built a railroad...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Oh, I dunno. In his shoes, I would say nothing at all that I didn't have to. I would be digging to find out who was behind all this, what they knew, and how best to obliterate them. If, of course, I had bought thousands of pills, I doubt I would've said that you (the public) will probably hear more than you want to. Or maybe I would have. My motto is, if John Law is involved, I say nothing that a lawyer doesn't tell me to say.
91 posted on 10/04/2003 4:47:57 AM PDT by I_dmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: LittleJoe
Well, we're really talking about two different things. I agree that there are volumes of bad laws on the books, and I have, as I've gotten older and perhaps a little more cynical, come to take a libertarian view on drug laws. Understand, I've never used an illegal drug, and never will; it's just obvious to me that the current "War on Drugs" is a colossal and colossally expensive failure. I would like to see Washington, instead of throwing more money at a bad idea, try something different. It would be a terrific precedent if nothing else.

But the solution is to overturn the existing laws using the mechanisms in place to do so, not to ignore them.

As far as Rush is concerned, to go back to my original statement, if it turns out that he has a problem with subscription painkillers that drove him to the black market, and to threaten his housekeeper (and I emphasize the if because we don't know everything yet), then conservatives need to do two things. The first, and most overwhelmingly important, is to get him the treatment he needs to lick the problem. And I will add that conservatives need to stand by him when the liberals shoot their arrows; so far we have rallied around him admirably and need to continue to do so.

And the second is to see that the laws are enforced. To try to make an exception for Rush would amount to the same hypocrisy liberals practice, where their icons are "above the law". Conservatives need to be above the liberals in words and actions. Rush undoubtedly understands this and the rest of the conservative world needs to as well.

92 posted on 10/04/2003 4:54:08 AM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: I_dmc; snopercod
I would like (actually not really but you get my point) to see some decisive proof aside from allegations.

But, you both sound like you both feel prudent silence may be in his interest....and not just as an abstract notion.

Is that not unsettling to you guys? It is to me. I have generally given great weight to the majority of Rush's views since the late 80s and am very troubled by what I'm seeing so far. I would place him in the ranks with Reagan and Newt insofar as movement galvanizers and this is pretty ugly stuff even if only part true....and aside from him...it gives our foes inexhaustible ammo.

I do not feel good about this. If he is guilty of nothing and the whole thing is a fabrication by the Clines and Ed Shohat, he could have said so from the second it landed.

I hope you guys are right.
93 posted on 10/04/2003 5:10:58 AM PDT by wardaddy (The Lizard King it was.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Cacophonous; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; bwteim; ...
The next day in the laundry room of Limbaugh's $24 million mansion, he asked his $370-a-week housekeeper for more pills, Wilma Cline told the tabloid. Soon, she said, the couple was supplying Limbaugh with 80 pills a month.

If Rush were smart, his housekeeper would be making twice as much a week. But this would be against his free market ideology, I suppose.

94 posted on 10/04/2003 5:22:05 AM PDT by A. Pole ("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
If Rush were smart, he would not have approached his housekeeper about access to painkillers. So let's see what he has to say about the matter.
95 posted on 10/04/2003 5:24:08 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
I don't know. Works out to $9.25 and hour, which sounds about right for unskilled labor. Is she a full-time housekeeper, i.e., forty hours a week, or does she supplement with other income?
96 posted on 10/04/2003 5:24:53 AM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Also, if she's full-time, does she live there so that room and board are part of her compensation?
97 posted on 10/04/2003 5:26:54 AM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Cacophonous
Works out to $9.25 and hour, which sounds about right for unskilled labor.

He, he. It must be exactly what Rush was thinking.

98 posted on 10/04/2003 5:27:13 AM PDT by A. Pole ("Is 87 billion dollars a great deal of money? Yes. Can our country afford it?" [Secretary Rumsfeld])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
I'm not trying to be difficult, but there is a lot that is not known. The $9.25 is based no a full week; maybe she keeps houses for two people, effectively doubling that (works out to about $36K annually). Maybe room and board are part of compensation.

I honestly don't know; I don't have a housekeeper, so I don't know how that is arranged.

99 posted on 10/04/2003 5:30:12 AM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
My Conservative beliefs do not depend on one person.
 

They were already 'present and formed' before Rush.....

.....they will remain unchanged even if he passes.

100 posted on 10/04/2003 5:34:47 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson