Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LA Times Spiked Davis Temper Story in '98 John and Ken 10/02 w/Jill Stewart and other...
John & Ken on air... | Jill Stewart

Posted on 10/02/2003 4:51:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne

Jill Stewart is a reporter who wrote an article on a Gray Davis for the now defunct New Times LA.  When she was working the story, she ran into an LA Times reporter working on the same story.

Jill states that she has it on good sources that the Democrats were ready to come out with something horrible that they still couldn't verify.  A female labor union official was going to claim rape.  This was pulled back since the Los Angeles Times had already slimed Schwarzenegger.

Her original story in 1997 was that Gray Davis had a severe temper and had a rep of getting physical with his staff, attacking his private staff members.  He was famous for hurling ashtrays, shouting the "F" word, pushing and shaking them.  This was known by the LA Tiimes in 1998.

Stewart took one year to soften one woman up to get her story.  One day he flew into a rage because staffers had moved some photos.  He went postal shouting, shaking and pushing a 62 year old staffer.  She had a nervous breakdown.  She suffered dermatoligical shock.  She was so effected that she could not continue to work, had to receive medical care and never returned to her job.  She was urged to file charges.  She approached an attorney who talked her out of it.  Either this woman or another policy analyst was shaken so hard she said her teeth rattled.  She said to him, Gray, think what you are doing to me.  Stop it.  He was so furious and out of control that he couldn't stop.

Stewart talked to a reporter who was working on the story...  LA Times.  They never reported this.  She asked why they never did. First of all, we don't go after major political players on anonymous sources.  Many editors at the Times were very worried about covering Gray's private conduct.

In 2002 the Times censored a George F. Will collumn, that mentioned Juanita Broaderick.  The LA Times actually ran an appology for doing it.  Will mentioned the rape of Juanita Broaderick.  His mention was a couple of sentences long.

Schwarzenegger's fondeling story went on and on.

There were previous articles about Schwarzenegger's activities in 2000.  One was for Premiere Magazine (related story) and the other was for the National Enquirer.  This story was out there for years, but the Times picked five days before the election to publish this rehash article.

On Hugh Hewitt's show he mentioned that the LA Times followed up on this morning's article by stating, (paraphrased) "Schwarzenegger admitted to the acts we reported this morning."  He did no such thing.  He said some reports have been untrue, but that he had acted badly in the past and wished to sincerely appologize to anyone that he had offended.  He did not mention the LA Times charges at all.

This article was just mentioned on-air.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: abuse; davis; davisassault; georgewill; jillstewart; juanitabroaderick; latimes; mediabias; recall; schwarzenegger; temper; violence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: DoughtyOne
Says it all:

In 2002 the Times censored a George F. Will collumn, that mentioned Juanita Broaderick. The LA Times actually ran an appology for doing it. Will mentioned the rape of Juanita Broaderick. His mention was a couple of sentences long.

Schwarzenegger's fondeling story went on and on.

There were previous articles about Schwarzenegger's activities in 2000. One was for Premiere Magazine (related story) and the other was for the National Enquirer. This story was out there for years, but the Times picked five days before the election to publish this rehash article.

21 posted on 10/02/2003 7:53:10 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
In 2002 the Times censored a George F. Will collumn, that mentioned Juanita Broaderick. The LA Times actually ran an appology for doing it. Will mentioned the rape of Juanita Broaderick. His mention was a couple of sentences long. Schwarzenegger's fondeling story went on and on.

Brit Hume discussed this on his evening broadcast pointing out the utter hypocrisy of the LA Times having no qualms putting the fondling story on the front page and the Juanita rape charges on page 15 or so. He said they found Will's statement (paraphrasing) "this President could well have raped a woman 15 years ago" so offensive that they chose to delete it.

22 posted on 10/02/2003 8:01:58 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Arnold. Sorry if I made that unclear.
23 posted on 10/02/2003 9:13:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Serial batterer Davis was also discussed at length on the Larry Elder radio show. Elder knows the former Times author and has interviewed her.
24 posted on 10/02/2003 9:17:57 PM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Yeah, I read it twice and was convinced you were referring to Gray Davis raping someone.

I couldn't picture it though...
25 posted on 10/02/2003 9:45:00 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Sure does doesn't it.
26 posted on 10/02/2003 10:22:15 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
I imagine the Times could be worse. I'm sure they'll find a way too.
27 posted on 10/02/2003 10:23:32 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: capitan_refugio
Very good. Thanks.
28 posted on 10/02/2003 10:24:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Sorry. When I'm making notes from the radio it doesn't flow well for me. I guess I didn't proof this well enough. Thanks for the comment. I'm glad you guys mentioned it. I'll be a little more careful.
29 posted on 10/02/2003 10:26:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
GRAY DAVIS, OFFICE BATTERER!

He should've been charged with assault.

One day he flew into a rage because staffers had moved some photos. He went postal shouting, shaking and pushing a 62 year old staffer. She had a nervous breakdown. She suffered dermatoligical shock. She was so effected that she could not continue to work, had to receive medical care and never returned to her job.

30 posted on 10/02/2003 10:30:15 PM PDT by socal_parrot (Rosebud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I don't know if it was the Jill Stewart article, but surprisingly the Chron ran an story about Gray and his temper and swearing and general abuse of his staff earlier this year. Don't remind the date but I remember the article because I was shocked that they would run a piece that spoke of Gary in a less than flattering light. This was the first I had ever heard of his temper and general nastiness towards those around him.
31 posted on 10/02/2003 10:34:55 PM PDT by pbear8 ( sed libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbear8
Thanks. That is interesting.
32 posted on 10/02/2003 10:43:11 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Jill Stewart is talking about this on Hannity right now.

She states that the Times spiked her original story because the editors "don't go with stories attacking main political candidates with unsubstantiated and un coorborated interviews!"
33 posted on 10/06/2003 1:14:28 PM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Ping a ling

You might want to use your ping list for this.
34 posted on 10/06/2003 1:19:22 PM PDT by LisaAnne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett
Yeah, what a hoot. These papers are so biased. Thanks for the heads up.
35 posted on 10/06/2003 1:22:14 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

bumperooni
36 posted on 10/06/2003 8:01:59 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson