|
|
|
 |
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
|
It is in the breaking news sidebar! |
|
Posted on 10/02/2003 12:18:22 PM PDT by jerseygirl
Russia bears its military teeth
Putin: Russia's nuclear arsenal as deadly as ever. Russian Defence Minister Sergei Ivanov has said his country does not rule out a pre-emptive military strike anywhere in the world if the national interest demands it. He said that Russia faced foreign interference in its internal affairs and instability in neighbouring states as well as classic threats such as the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, international terrorism and the drugs trade
President Vladimir Putin, who met Mr Ivanov on Thursday, added that the Russian military still possessed a formidable nuclear arsenal.
A report by the Defence Ministry also called on Nato to review its strategy, warning that otherwise it would be necessary to pursue "a radical reconstruction of Russian military planning, including changes in Russian nuclear strategy".
Their [Russian missiles'] combat characteristics, including the surmounting of any systems of anti-missile defences, are unrivalled
Vladimir Putin
Mr Putin has signed an agreement with US President George W Bush to cut the two countries' nuclear arsenals by two-thirds in 10 years.
But many in Russia's military establishment are angry about former East Bloc allies joining Nato, as the Western alliance moves into traditional spheres of Russian influence.
Iraq lessons
Mr Ivanov was speaking in Moscow at a conference of the Russian military leadership.
In an apparent reference to the US-led invasion of Iraq, Mr Ivanov said that the use of force without UN approval could encourage countries to acquire a nuclear potential.
But he said that Russia could not rule out the use of force itself "if the interests of Russia or its alliance obligations demand it".
Russia's new national security doctrine, unveiled last year, allows the use of all possible force, including nuclear weapons, to oppose attacks, if all other methods fail.
Previously, Russia said it would only use nuclear weapons if its national sovereignty was under threat.
Addressing Thursday's meeting, Mr Putin said Russia had "at her disposal a considerable... stockpile of heavy ground-launched strategic missiles...".
"Their combat characteristics, including the surmounting of any systems of anti-missile defences, are unrivalled," he said.
The president added that the arsenal included many strategic nuclear missiles never before deployed.
Are you listening N. Korea?
|
|
|
|
|
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
|
It is in the breaking news sidebar! |
|
Is that a message for the US?
Notably abssent is any comment from Kofi Annan, who spent last week telling the US how evil it is for daring to "circumvent" the UN in achieving the overthrow of Saddam. That "pre-emptive military strike... [in] the national interest" was, predictably, shocking to him, yet this comment goes unnoticed.
MAN, I'm geting tired of these ungrateful tinpot dictators taking advantage of our national maturity, generosity, and goodwill.
No, that's actually what Bush pointed out to Putin when we withdrew from the CCCP-U.S. ABM treaty.
Thus, that message is for the backbiters who are snapping at Putin's political heels inside Russia herself; i.e. those who claim that Putin "sold out" to Bush by not going to war over Bush withdrawing from the ABM treaty.
And by the way, the **technical** reason that Russia can overcome any missile defense is that Russia simply has more missiles that are still in launchable condition than does anyone else have ABM launchers currently deployed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.