Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush aides anger GOP lawmakers on consular IDs
Washington Times ^ | 10-02-03

Posted on 10/02/2003 7:02:21 AM PDT by Brian S

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:40:43 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Bush administration officials yesterday angered lawmakers by refusing to take a position on illegal aliens obtaining U.S. driver's licenses and avoiding questions about its decision to recognize Mexican identification cards.

Officials testifying before the House Select Committee on Homeland Security said they are reviewing what documentation is secure and reliable, but evaded direct questions on the matricula consular cards now accepted by California and New Mexico to obtain driver's licenses.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: consular; matricula; matriculaconsular; republicanturncoats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: MissAmericanPie
The Office of Homeland Security is a 32 billion dollar joke when our borders are wide open.

Let's not forget, they're not an Office anymore, they're a DEPARTMENT!!!!! A department with nothing to do but dream up color coding schemes, corner the market on duct tape, and practice shooting down airliners because there's no mandate to secure the borders.
61 posted on 10/03/2003 12:51:08 PM PDT by johnb838 (Deconstruct the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Don't play around the edges of the elephant in the room by accusing me of being upset with a few pork barrel bills. What will effect all born in the USofA is the illegal alien vote.

You can't continue to tap dance around that issue and be honest. I was flamed to a golden brown for saying a year ago that the plan was to give them the vote, now you see it happening with your own eyes. There is an obvious move afoot to fold the USofA into other countries via the citizens being out voted by illegals and the FTAA treaty. I bet you didn't go read the FTAA site like I asked you to.

Now if you want to call that the New World Order, or One World Goverment, or Gobal Totalitarianism, pick your label, it is happening before your eyes, intentionally aided and abetted by the Republican politicians and the Democrat politicians. So open, open, open, those peepers.
62 posted on 10/03/2003 1:30:23 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
Bravo for the letter.
63 posted on 10/03/2003 1:35:27 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
Gee, that's some snazzy little logo they're using, ain't it! (/sarcasm)

www.usembassy-mexico.gov

64 posted on 10/03/2003 2:04:43 PM PDT by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Don't look now, but illegal immigration is **down** year on year from last year to now.
65 posted on 10/03/2003 2:30:43 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Fine.

But when is he going to seal the damn border and stop the illegals?
66 posted on 10/03/2003 2:36:10 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Don't look now, but illegal immigration is **down** year on year from last year to now.

No, what's down are apprehensions. At best, we have a slower rate of growth of the Illegal Alien population in the United States. By any estimate, there are now a couple of million more Ilegals than there were in January of 2001.

There are other factors that might account for the reduction in apprehensions. Since over 90% of apprehensions occur within three days of crossing the border, a reduction could be the result of fewer back and forth border crossings by Illegals since 9/11.

Also, the sluggish economy has reduced demand for Illegals.

There's plenty of spin coming from the Feds on Illegals, but not much in the way of actual results.

No surprise, really, since the plan is Amnesty by "guest worker" anyway.


67 posted on 10/03/2003 2:42:49 PM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The fact that illegal aliens have increased their donations to Mexico from $9 billion to $12 billion in one year says alot. To me there definitely has been an increase in the number of illegal Mexicans.
68 posted on 10/03/2003 3:25:36 PM PDT by texastoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: Indict Davis
"You have proof, I presume. Where is it?"


"COCHISE COUNTY -- The number of illegal immigrants encountered in Cochise County is increasing again in what Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever likens to a tidal wave.

... Dever is not surprised that figures released earlier this week by U.S. Border Patrol officials show that more than half of the illegal immigrants taken into custody in the agency's Tucson Sector were in Cochise County.

...
For the entire 2,000-mile border with Mexico, the apprehension figures went down 2.4 percent -- from 955,310 to 932,000 -- from the previous federal fiscal year to the one that ended Tuesday."

Link Here

70 posted on 10/03/2003 10:46:08 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
c#70
71 posted on 10/03/2003 10:46:42 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Go here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/989088/posts

Read the full article and you will understand what I am talking about.

Quite possibly the apprehensions are down but I don't think the numbers crossing are down.

Our economy has been sluggish this past year for legal and illegal jobs. The only way that this increase of 3 billion could possible be is that we have had a drastic increase in illegals. As I don't think their salaries have been increased this much. Do you?

The only other reason that I can think of that would put extra money in the illegals pockets is that the WIC program has been increased from baby to the age of 5 year olds. When you can use government money for groceries, then one can afford to send money home.

Oops, I reread the article and found the previous high of last year to be $10 billion and this year $12 billion.

72 posted on 10/03/2003 11:33:13 PM PDT by texastoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: texastoo
Or it could just be that illegals are sending less cash through the mail back to Mexico, et al, while sending more wires through banks (where the money can be more easily traced and filed into our stats) now that consular cards and such make it easier for them to obtain bank accounts...
73 posted on 10/03/2003 11:41:55 PM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Let me guess, this is a government statistic? Maybe not, after all they are all in the USofA now. They have closed several public schools in Mexico City due to lack of population.
74 posted on 10/04/2003 1:00:36 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I believe the illegals have always sent money via wire transfers rather than the mail system due to corruption in Mexico.

This is a rather moot argument at this point as our borders will not be closed by this administration. Probably the only way to tell for sure how many Mexicans are crossing the border would be to compare the rise in state deficits with the increase in money sent to Mexico.
75 posted on 10/04/2003 8:57:28 AM PDT by texastoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
"""Rove is one of Bush's worst choices"""

Bush was my worst choice...I didn't vote for him in the primary...I should have voted for Buchanan like I had planned and not wasted my vote on Bush...

I won't make that mistake again...
76 posted on 10/13/2003 3:18:02 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
I voted for Alany Keyes in the primary. Not voting for Bush in 2004 will put Hillary or Dean or Kerry in the White House - far worse choices.
77 posted on 10/16/2003 11:05:52 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Iscool; All
...I won't make that mistake again...

Nor will I. BTW, when printed out, these threads make great postpaid envelope stuffers for all those requests for money from the Bush campaign.

78 posted on 10/17/2003 7:22:11 AM PDT by GunsareOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson