This may be true. Of course we wouldn't know for certain unless you ran for office first. Then your opponents might test whether you ever touched a man or woman without first obtaining their consent. In which case you would say "never." You are awesome, good job, well done.
However, that response is typical of responses given during the Clinton debacle by defenders of Clinton.
It was typical in the absence of proof. After the allegations mounted it became unsustainable for some.
Women are going public with accusations of unwanted groping. That should be a sign.
They are ?
What are their names ?
Where are their lawsuits ?
When did it happen and what office did he occupy at the time ?
What has Gray Davis told you about the matter ?
Who is the politician who is pro-abortion, anti-gun, pro-homosexual marriage, pro-tax, pro-big government AND he is accused of groping women against their wishes? Until last night most Americans would automatically have answer "Bill Clinton." Now they can say, "Bill Schwarzeneggar."
They can say what they wish. Just spell the name right.
McClintock is the better man....imo, since I'm a conservative.
I am pragmatic enough to realize that McClintock and/or Schwarz needs to make a last minute announcement releasing their supporters.
However, they play dirty pool in politics. Proof of these allegations will shortly be forthcoming. If Schwarz gets shot dead in the next 48 hours, he needs to fall on his sword. If the proof isn't forthcoming, then Mac needs to fall on his.
Remember.....multiple women willing to make an accusation in public (not just in print) IS considered to warrant investigation of a pattern of misbehavior.
This story, released in time to hit the Thursday news wires just before an election, has Chris Lehane's fingerprints all over it. Lehane is the Democrats' dirty tricks specialist who engineered the DWI hit on Bush on the Thursday before Election 2000 and who was just fired by presidential hopeful John Kerry.