Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House won't rule out polygraphs in leak probe
CNN.com ^ | 10/01/03

Posted on 10/01/2003 2:25:14 PM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:12 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The White House pledged full cooperation Wednesday with a Justice Department probe into the leak of a CIA operative's name, and a spokesman did not rule out the possibility that Bush administration employees could face lie-detector tests.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: josephwilson; leak; plamenameblamegame; polygraph
It just so happened that I understand the Democrats on the Hill leaked the fact that this report had been made about this particular situation.

Who gave the Dems this information ?

1 posted on 10/01/2003 2:25:15 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Who did Wilson talk to at CNN?
2 posted on 10/01/2003 2:26:49 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Helle Dale called for polygraphing everybody in a column in today's Washington Times.
3 posted on 10/01/2003 2:28:48 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Including Wilson.
4 posted on 10/01/2003 2:30:48 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Maybe they could use that guy on "Who wants to date my daughter" reality TV series. We could make it "Who wants to out the State Department/CIA leaker"
5 posted on 10/01/2003 2:32:50 PM PDT by Solson (Our work is the presentation of our capabilities. - Von Goethe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Including Wilson.

Especially Wilson and Novak, the principals behind this event.

6 posted on 10/01/2003 2:33:16 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; nicollo; seamole; Miss Marple
They're required to do that. It just so happened that I understand the Democrats on the Hill leaked the fact that this report had been made about this particular situation."

This was all started by a Democratic leak on the Hill..

Who called the Post this weekend and fed them this story..

7 posted on 10/01/2003 2:34:56 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Bush is handling this very well. In the end, his cabinet could be purged of traitors and he'll come out smelling like a rose. Well done, george.
8 posted on 10/01/2003 2:36:02 PM PDT by Kleon (To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
They said the CIA asked for the investigation. Who in the CIA told the Dems?
9 posted on 10/01/2003 2:36:42 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; Miss Marple; seamole
Who in the CIA called the Democrats on the Hill to tell them this matter had been referred to the Justice Dept.
10 posted on 10/01/2003 2:37:22 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: piasa; Grampa Dave; seamole; mrustow; Sabertooth; Miss Marple; Reb Raider; MizSterious; Endeavor; ..

This is the Plame Name Blame Game ping list.
Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
You may also find all posts to this ping list by searching on keyword PLAMENAMEBLAMEGAME.

Note this is a HIGH-VOLUME ping list!
Please ping me to any Plame/Wilson threads!
There is no way I can catch them all myself!!


11 posted on 10/01/2003 2:39:08 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Just a guess, but when Tenet referred the matter to Justice for an investigation, he prolly had to inform the Congress Intel people along with the WH.

IMO, Tenet could've squashed this.
12 posted on 10/01/2003 2:39:08 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
OK.....but someone fed the story to the Compost this weekend.

Who were the reporters on that wrote that article?

13 posted on 10/01/2003 2:41:21 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"More recently, she has been working at a management level within the operations section of the CIA. Penalties for revealing the identity of a covert agent range from five to 10 years in prison and fines from $25,000 to $50,000. "

Well, there you have it. She is no longer covert, so there's no foul. Case closed.

Michael

14 posted on 10/01/2003 2:41:22 PM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
She was a manager..
15 posted on 10/01/2003 2:43:04 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dog
She was a manager..

In the Directorate of Operations.

16 posted on 10/01/2003 2:44:23 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Yes, she was a manager. Is a manager. That's not covert.

Michael

17 posted on 10/01/2003 2:45:49 PM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Then, IMO, there is a valid case.

Her cover was an overt WND analyst but a manager in the Ops means access, knowledge and involvement in the operations side.

Bush WH should do an immediate hangout; damage control time. Throw a staffer to the lions.

Don't let it go higher; major scandals when u start pulling on a string and the whole sweater unravels.
18 posted on 10/01/2003 2:48:23 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Justice Department should polygraph CIA Director George Tenent, a Clinton Appointee.
19 posted on 10/01/2003 3:30:28 PM PDT by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
A polygraph dragnet is not likely to help in this investigation. Polygraph "testing" is junk science. It has an inherent bias against the truthful, and yet is easily defeated through the use of simple countermeasures that polygraph operators cannot detect.

To learn how to pass (or beat) the polygraph, see AntiPolygraph.org's free e-book, The lie Behind the Lie Detector (1 mb PDF; click on link or graphic to download).

For further information on the pseudoscience of polygraphy, visit AntiPolygraph.org.


20 posted on 10/02/2003 1:05:51 AM PDT by George Maschke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson