Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

.
1 posted on 10/01/2003 1:02:12 PM PDT by luckydevi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: luckydevi
Interesting. Glad the local Repubs have the right attitude toward the experiment.
2 posted on 10/01/2003 1:06:14 PM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
Here is the official press release :

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACTS:

Elizabeth McKinstry, Vice-President

Phone: 734-904-5712

Email: emckinstry@freestateproject.org

Jason Sorens, President

Phone: 203-432-5824

Email: jsorens@freestateproject.org

Website: www.freestateproject.org

Free State Project picks New Hampshire

· Group aims to recruit 20,000 liberty-minded individuals to move

· Membership vote selects NH out of ten candidates for planned migration

· Free Staters hope to reinforce, enhance "sphere of individual liberty" in the Live Free or Die state

· Project has earned backing of NH governor, some state legislators

· Trickle of early movers expected to start this year

Aiming to preserve one bastion of freedom in the age of intrusive government, members of the rapidly growing Free State Project (FSP) have made a crucial decision. Voting via mail-in ballot after months of feisty debate, Free Staters chose New Hampshire as their future home.

Founded in 2001, the FSP's goal is to concentrate 20,000 liberty-oriented voters in one state. There, it is hoped, they will work to enhance and extend its existing culture of liberty. But until this week, it was anyone's guess whether that state would be

Montana, Wyoming, Delaware, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, Idaho, North

Dakota, South Dakota, or Alaska.

The membership election took place through the innovative Condorcet's Method, which allowed voters to rank all states and selected the state that received a higher ranking than each other state from a majority of voters. The runner-up state was Wyoming, which defeated every other state but fell to New Hampshire by the decisive margin of 55 per cent to 45 per cent.

"New Hampshire is clearly the consensus choice of Free Staters," commented FSP President and Yale political science professor Jason Sorens. "New Hampshire won a plurality of first-preference votes from every region of the country except the West."

"It's not difficult to see the reasons for New Hampshire's victory," adds Vice-President Elizabeth McKinstry, who is originally from New England. "The state boasts the lowest state and local tax burden in the continental U.S., the leanest state government in the country in terms of government spending and employment, a citizen legislature, a healthy job market, and perhaps most important, local support for our movement."

Over 100 New Hampshire residents have signed up for the Free State Project already, willing to move elsewhere but hoping to bring the movement to their home state. Governor Craig Benson even pledged to support the aims of the FSP, and several members of the legislature have signed up as members. [OVERà]

According to FSP Director of Member Services and Florida attorney Tim Condon, Free Staters should also be a boon for the economy of New Hampshire. "According to a member survey conducted concomitantly with the vote, 50% of our members have at least a Bachelor's degree, with 18% having done postgraduate work. Seventy-five per cent are under age 50, with 38% between the ages of 18 and 34. Those earning $60,000 or more per year constitute 44% of all members. The clear picture that emerges is one of a largely young, well educated, upwardly mobile group."

Several hurdles still face the movement, which currently has about 4,500 members pledged to migrate to New Hampshire. These challenges include recruiting another 15,500 members and continuing to build support for their cause within New Hampshire. If current recruitment trends continue, the group expects to reach 20,000 commitments by 2006, after which point members have five years in which to move.

But as Condon notes, "The member survey shows that 53% of members plan to move within three years, not waiting for the 20,000-member benchmark. Early movers should help recruitment by building a record of success."

3 posted on 10/01/2003 1:07:57 PM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
As long as they don't unseat any Republicans at the national level and shift power to the RATS, I'm all for it. On that note I must say that I truely truely would prefer to have seen South Dakota as the winner.
4 posted on 10/01/2003 1:10:20 PM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
Some free-staters want to... legalize medicinal marijuana...

And define all marijuana use as "medicinal", and then legalize marijuana, and then legalize all other drugs.

And then explain away the resulting mess.

5 posted on 10/01/2003 1:12:30 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ppaul; ex-snook; Inspector Harry Callahan; WarHawk42; Satadru; Ted; greenthumb; willa; ...
*ping*
6 posted on 10/01/2003 1:21:01 PM PDT by sheltonmac (If having the U.S. enforce U.N. resolutions is not world government, what is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
Babiarz, a database consultant, said critics have it wrong: ``We're not here to invade or take over. We're here to restore the American dream.''

Well, to be perfectly honest, John, the Free State Project is precisely about invading and taking over.

One wonders what drove him to tell this particular, glaringly obvious, untruth.

10 posted on 10/01/2003 1:30:12 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
Note Republican Governor says "...we'd LOVE to have them." And the 'Crat Party Chairwoman calls them "anarchists!"

Curious if any LP members here on FR are moving up to NH any time soon?

11 posted on 10/01/2003 1:30:50 PM PDT by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
Those of us up here in "Soviet Granolastan" (Vermont) will be watching this with interest!

I wonder if I can talk DH into moving....

LQ
14 posted on 10/01/2003 1:33:19 PM PDT by LizardQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
Start with removing home school regulations. All the rest will follow.
17 posted on 10/01/2003 1:50:12 PM PDT by cruiserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
It seems that we also need a "free congressional district" project in as many states as possible.

When the "free-staters" begin ignoring Federal mandates, it would be nice to have a bunch of Congressmen who would oppose any retribution.

20 posted on 10/01/2003 1:56:02 PM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
Wow, what a happy coincidence- this weekend I will be heading up to NH to look at real estate. Any Freepers from the Lakes area?
21 posted on 10/01/2003 1:57:03 PM PDT by Vesuvian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
I was hoping for NH, joining is a strong possibility.
24 posted on 10/01/2003 2:01:07 PM PDT by Triple (All forms of socialism deny individuals the right to the fruits of their labor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
Do you think 20,000 will be enough?
28 posted on 10/01/2003 2:07:16 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
One can't help but have visions of large choirs of Libertarian true believers clad in white pumping the air with their fists whilst singing a version of the Pet Shop Boys song "Go West". Go "North East" might be more appropriate.

The dream of setting up a utopia far from the craziness of current events is as old and pervasive as human civilization. This is simply a Libertarian version of the search for the Promised Land.

The article omits to mention, of course, the pre-eminent reason why NH and the runner-up states were chosen; they all have relatively small populations which is a prerequisite for any Libertarian invasion. 20,000 Libertarians aren't going to do diddly squat in a state the size of NY or California, but in a small state they just may have an impact, although not necessarily for the better.

I nominate NH for some sort of bravery and public service award. By acting as a Libertarian "sink" they are taking the loonies out of our hair and concentrating them all in one place. That lets the rest of us enjoy a little more sanity. Once they get 20,000 in there, they should erect a fence around the place so they can't get out again.

31 posted on 10/01/2003 2:08:47 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: luckydevi
NH is a good choice for the Libertarians. It has a common border with Canada and access to the sea.

Makes drug smuggling easier.
65 posted on 10/02/2003 5:36:43 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson