To: Pete
FOr real? Uh...."CHEMICAL WEAPONS *FROM* IRAQ???"
Where's the fervor from the media? Um, isn't this kinda important if true?????
2 posted on
10/01/2003 12:39:41 PM PDT by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: sam_paine
Where's the fervor from the media? Um, isn't this kinda important if true????? I thought so. It was one of those surreal moments where I am reading something and thinking, "Does this say what I think it says?".
5 posted on
10/01/2003 12:41:15 PM PDT by
Pete
To: sam_paine
WHAT!! That's what I thought too when I read this.
Isn't this the WMD we've been looking for ..?? Why isn't the media all over this story ..??
168 posted on
10/01/2003 1:51:38 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
(America - The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth)
To: sam_paine
" Um, isn't this kinda important if true?????"
I believe what they confiscated was the empty warheads, not the actual chemical or biological crap that goes inside them. But, this is quite a catch none the less. It would have been nice to find out where these were headed, but it's impossible to follow that much stuff to its eventual destinations, especially if the shipment is broken up. Maybe they were headed to the same place as the actual chemicals/nuclear materials.
To: sam_paine
Where's the fervor from the media? Um, isn't this kinda important if true????? 6:19pm on the east coast... still no fervor from the media over this. What's going on???
401 posted on
10/01/2003 3:12:22 PM PDT by
nutmeg
("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
To: sam_paine
Considering Saddam had no WMD's, this should validate this administration's purpose and say "smoking gun" wouldn't you think?
531 posted on
10/01/2003 7:50:42 PM PDT by
JustPiper
(We deserve no less than closed border's after 911!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson