Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kuwait Foils Biochem Arms Smuggling From Iraq
Dow Jones Newswires ^ | October 1 | AP

Posted on 10/01/2003 12:37:34 PM PDT by Pete

KUWAIT CITY (AP)--Kuwaiti security authorities have foiled an attempt to smuggle $60 million worth of chemical weapons and biological warheads from Iraq to an unnamed European country, a Kuwaiti newspaper said Wednesday.

The pro-government Al-Siyassah, quoting an unnamed security source, said the suspects had been watched by security since they arrived in Kuwait and were arrested "in due time." It didn't say when or how the smugglers entered Kuwait or when they were arrested.

The paper said the smugglers might have had accomplices inside Kuwait. It said Interior Minister Sheik Nawwaf Al Ahmed Al Sabah would hand over the smuggled weapons to an FBI agent at a news conference, but didn't say when.

Government officials couldn't be immediately reached for comment.

Iraqi Interior Minister Nouri Al-Badran met Tuesday with Sheik Nawwaf and discussed cooperation between the two countries in security matters. His visit is the first by an Iraqi interior minister to Kuwait since 1990.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armssmuggling; biochem; foiled; iraq; kuwait; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640641-649 next last
To: andak01
Just checking in for the latest on this potentially very important story.

wolrdnetDaily has it up too now,FWIW.

621 posted on 10/02/2003 11:25:44 AM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 620 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Hey, Trib, would love to know if Glen generated any excitment with the listeners. This thing still seems to be alive yet unacknowledged.
622 posted on 10/02/2003 11:27:18 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
It's still just bubbling. The guy filling in for Rush mentioned it about an hour ago.
623 posted on 10/02/2003 11:48:29 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
From WND article: Saddam's weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, some have turned up in Kuwait, according to Kuwaiti newspaper ** Al-Siyassah.**

Im not sure how credible Al SEyassah is, they however do believe themselves to be credible, or course:

"Dar Al-Seyassah is now Kuwait's leading publishing house. It is also one of the largest and most moderns printing plants in the Middle East. There are three Dar Al-Seyassah publications - all with Pan Arab distribution.

Over the past 32 years Al-Seyassah has build a unique reputation in the Arab World for hard-hitting, investigative journalism and independent political comment. It is widely quoted by international news agencies as an informed observer of events in the Middle East. Exclusives, many with the jarallah by-line, are quoted internationally.

A broadsheet daily, averaging 32 pages, it is one of the most successful advertising mediums in the Middle East. Five pages of Business & Finance, four pages of People, backed by the Arts, TV programs, Culture, Services, The World, Issues & Opinions, comprehensive Sports coverage, announcement of government tenders, make it required reading for Arab businessmen.

Al-Seyassah is in the remarkable position of being the only Arabic newspaper to be distributed uncensored throughout Saudi Arabia. This unequalled advantage over all other newspapers has enabled Al-Seyassah to become the voice of the Arab people, reflecting their opinions while keeping them informed about current affairs.."

alseyassah@alseyassah.com

624 posted on 10/02/2003 11:50:41 AM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: No Blue States
This is maddening.
625 posted on 10/02/2003 11:52:25 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
I feel the same. Wishing this story would be proven false or true. Its suprising to me that Drudge, WND, AP, among others have it out, but its still getting little traction.

I dont get it, if true this should be everywhere imo.

While at the same time if it were false, its lasted longer than any other dead lead on WMD ive seen.

626 posted on 10/02/2003 12:00:54 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 625 | View Replies]

To: No Blue States
". . .if it were false, its lasted longer than any other dead lead on WMD ive seen."

Exactly. And here's another way of looking at it. The lib press should be falling over itself rushing to do stories on this "false" report so they can take the opportunity to gloat about WMD not being found yet.

Nothing about this story adds up.
627 posted on 10/02/2003 12:05:20 PM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Great observation, that didnt cross my mind.
You know they would be all over proving it false if they could.
628 posted on 10/02/2003 12:07:44 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: Pete
bump
629 posted on 10/02/2003 12:08:59 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete
"Kuwaiti security sources told Reuters on Wednesday the report on the seizure of such weapons was baseless."

So does this mean that the report that biological weapons were captured was false, and what they really have are smuggled archeological artifacts?
630 posted on 10/02/2003 12:29:11 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
So does this mean that the report that biological weapons were captured was false, and what they really have are smuggled archeological artifacts?

Clearly, that is what Reuters wishes to communicate. I would point out that in yesterday's AP story, there was no mention of artifacts. I have not read the original story since it is in Arabic but it appears to me that the artifact aspect of this story was not part of the original.

631 posted on 10/02/2003 12:35:14 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
WMDS and Artifacts look so much alike it hard to tell the difference, at 1st?

Ps: Im questioning the change in their story, not you.

632 posted on 10/02/2003 12:37:32 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies]

To: Pete
It may be telling that the Hindustan Times web site no longer lists this story on either its main page, or in the World section that it was originally under.
633 posted on 10/02/2003 12:38:52 PM PDT by dpayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
Kuwaiti security authorities have foiled an attempt to smuggle $60 million worth of chemical weapons and biological warheads from Iraq to an unnamed European country....

Une porte francaise, posiblement?

634 posted on 10/02/2003 12:39:00 PM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
Tom Sullivan mentioned this story as he was filling in for Rush today.
635 posted on 10/02/2003 12:55:34 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: dpayton
I was able to bring it up at

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_399454,00050004.htm

But it took a couple of refreshes to connect to the page.

636 posted on 10/02/2003 12:58:16 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies]

To: JeffreyH
Same goes for when they found those mobile trailers with chemicals in them

Correction: there were more then innitial reports on two of the mobile trailers. Tests were run and they came back positive for traces of chemical/bio weapons. That makes the two labs real, but the rest of the stuff you sited, including this latest report is probably not.

637 posted on 10/02/2003 1:02:15 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: No Blue States
Hoping for verification, this would be great news if proven true

Don't hold your breadth, I'd give it one chance in a thousand.

638 posted on 10/02/2003 1:05:47 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
I checked it a couple of hours ago too and it was still there, it also showed todays date, Oct 2nd.

Does it appear now that this story was either false, or covered up?

Is it strange that only Reuters got the new WMDless storyline and no one else?

Confusing, guess im on the unbeliever list for now until or unless something else transpires.

639 posted on 10/02/2003 1:08:19 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: No Blue States
Bump for later
640 posted on 10/02/2003 1:27:27 PM PDT by watchwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640641-649 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson