Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kuwait Foils Biochem Arms Smuggling From Iraq
Dow Jones Newswires ^ | October 1 | AP

Posted on 10/01/2003 12:37:34 PM PDT by Pete

KUWAIT CITY (AP)--Kuwaiti security authorities have foiled an attempt to smuggle $60 million worth of chemical weapons and biological warheads from Iraq to an unnamed European country, a Kuwaiti newspaper said Wednesday.

The pro-government Al-Siyassah, quoting an unnamed security source, said the suspects had been watched by security since they arrived in Kuwait and were arrested "in due time." It didn't say when or how the smugglers entered Kuwait or when they were arrested.

The paper said the smugglers might have had accomplices inside Kuwait. It said Interior Minister Sheik Nawwaf Al Ahmed Al Sabah would hand over the smuggled weapons to an FBI agent at a news conference, but didn't say when.

Government officials couldn't be immediately reached for comment.

Iraqi Interior Minister Nouri Al-Badran met Tuesday with Sheik Nawwaf and discussed cooperation between the two countries in security matters. His visit is the first by an Iraqi interior minister to Kuwait since 1990.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armssmuggling; biochem; foiled; iraq; kuwait; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 641-649 next last
To: tsmith130
Yes, that's right.

Surely this smuggling operation has been an ongoing affair. It will be interesting to see what other weapons were delivered to this "unnamed European country."

481 posted on 10/01/2003 4:26:01 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
This is exactly what I wondered when I first read it, which may explain the lack of media coverage.

Whether the warheads are armed or not is irrelevant. It is simply more proof that he had an active WMD program and contrary to reports by the media that he destroyed everything to bluff us into obliterating his regime.

I'd be interested in what European country would be paying 60 million for empty warheads however, real interested.

482 posted on 10/01/2003 4:26:07 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
and his stongest words were "it is UNLIKELY" that the transaction ever took place.

Clarification: The administration never alleged that Iraq "acquired" the yellow cake. The allegation was that Saddam was "trying to acquire" yellow cake. Besides, we never said it, we cited the Brit's allegation that he was trying to acquire it.

483 posted on 10/01/2003 4:31:48 PM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Bookmarked for further reading.

My impression is that, having reported several stories about WMD discoveries, the media is simply trying to get absolute confirmation before they run with this. That plus the fact that as much as we are hoping this is true, they are hoping its false.

484 posted on 10/01/2003 4:38:58 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
It's $60 million, not billion. Which should be enough for a few quart bottles of Anthrax and/or VX. That's what I want to see... jugs of mega-poison!

If you were the smuggler, what would be easier to smuggle without getting caught - A case of nasties, or 15 truck loads? It makes perfect sense that what may get smuggled out of the country would be in smaller increments.

485 posted on 10/01/2003 4:42:35 PM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
SPEFIC and SERIES Threads?
486 posted on 10/01/2003 4:43:36 PM PDT by visualops (Two Wrongs don't make a right- they make the Democratic Ticket for 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
"HUGE:"

Well done. Now this:

Hugh, as in Hugh Rodham, first felon's brother-in-law, or Hugh O'brian, star of the 1960's TV program, Wyatt Earp.

Is it time for a FR seminar on spelling?
487 posted on 10/01/2003 4:54:36 PM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies]

To: Pete
It said Interior Minister Sheik Nawwaf Al Ahmed Al Sabah would hand over the smuggled weapons to an FBI agent at a news conference, but didn't say when.

This is key. IF there was to be a news conference the news media would have known by now. The original post is nearly 5 hours old, an eternity in the media.

Seeing that no media outlet is telling us about possible breaking news at an upcoming news conference, I am beginning to believe there is something wrong with this story.

488 posted on 10/01/2003 4:57:17 PM PDT by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
sure_fine Since Sep 30, 2003

sure_fine is a newbie. Either a re-signup or a troll. Or maybe not. But if a lurker, the poster would recognize "hugh."

489 posted on 10/01/2003 4:58:37 PM PDT by EggsAckley (..........................all my pings are belong to ......YOU.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: technomage
Yup! It's starting to stink! BUMMER! :[
490 posted on 10/01/2003 5:00:30 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: technomage
Seeing that no media outlet is telling us about possible breaking news at an upcoming news conference, I am beginning to believe there is something wrong with this story.

David Kay is testifying tomorrow on WMDs in Iraq. I would be very surprised if he did not address this story - even if only to dismiss it. He would look pretty stupid if he didn't mention it and it turns out to be true. Anyway, here is hoping for clarification.

491 posted on 10/01/2003 5:00:42 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: Pete
MAKE LIBERALS SHUT THE F**K UP BUMP!!!
492 posted on 10/01/2003 5:07:55 PM PDT by Carthago delenda est (Greedy capitalists get money by trade. Good liberals steal it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete
bttt
493 posted on 10/01/2003 5:08:09 PM PDT by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Yeah. Really stinks. And there's a couple of news sites out there that are probably a little ....er........miffed.
494 posted on 10/01/2003 5:14:24 PM PDT by EggsAckley (..........................all my pings are belong to ......YOU.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
That plus the fact that as much as we are hoping this is true, they are hoping its false.

That, and they may want to wait for an administration spokesman to make the announcement. This has three advantages to the media: (1) It makes the administration appear to be boasting, (2) Liberals (i.e. their loyal fan base) will be less likely to believe it, and (3) If it proves to be false, the media won't take the fall, and in fact can then start a series of stories about Bush misleading the public.

495 posted on 10/01/2003 5:16:05 PM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell (Hillary walks into a bar. Let's hope it leaves a nice bump on her forehead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: Pete
In a related development, Hitlery issued the following statement: "This is all Bush's fault. How could he let Iraq's chemical weapons, which they never had, be smuggled out of Iraq. This is more proof that the Democrat Party is the only party that Americans can trust with issues of national security".
496 posted on 10/01/2003 5:16:20 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
I know everyone is trying to be circumspect here, but we deserve a little fun after all this Wilson/Novak crap. If a substantial amount of WMD is discovered, how badly will the Dems lose the next 10 Presidential and congressional elections?
497 posted on 10/01/2003 5:20:11 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
EggsAckley, I am new.....and hardly a trol
so lets not get personal
498 posted on 10/01/2003 5:21:03 PM PDT by sure_fine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: technomage
"Seeing that no media outlet is telling us about possible breaking news at an upcoming news conference, I am beginning to believe there is something wrong with this story."

I have the same thoughts. Could it be that the US government is trying to delay the media response to this while they round up other parties in Europe? Its hard to believe the media would cooperate with Bush to this extent however. I'm puzzled?????

499 posted on 10/01/2003 5:22:05 PM PDT by lstanle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
hardly a trol

A Trol? Cool...

See there... even though you're new you've come up with something that might work it's way into the FR vernacular. :-)

500 posted on 10/01/2003 5:24:17 PM PDT by Ramius (--> Post No Bills <--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 641-649 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson