Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ambassador Says White House Adviser Told Press His Wife Was ‘Fair Game’
abcnews.com ^ | Octo. 2, 2003 | abcnews .com

Posted on 10/01/2003 12:31:57 PM PDT by prairiebreeze

Oct. 1— The former ambassador who accused the White House of leaking the identity of his CIA officer wife to the press says Washington reporters told him that senior White House adviser Karl Rove said his wife was "fair game."

The ambassador, Joseph Wilson, said he plans to give the names of the reporters to the FBI, which is conducting a full-blown investigation of the possible leak.

"I will be revealing the names of everybody who called me and cited White House sources or cited people specifically," Wilson said in an interview with Nightline's Ted Koppel.

Revealing a CIA officer's identity is a felony — but only if the person who leaked it did so knowing that the officer was undercover.

Wilson has said he believes his wife's identity was revealed in an attempt to punish him for accusing the administration of manipulating intelligence to exaggerate the threat from Iraq.

On July 6, Wilson wrote an op-ed piece in The New York Times saying that the Bush administration had manipulated intelligence about Iraq's weapons programs. He cited specifically a line from President Bush's State of the Union speech about Iraq seeking uranium from Africa — information the White House later admitted was inaccurate.

Wilson had traveled to Niger in 2002 to investigate allegations of uranium sales to Iraq, and concluded the allegations were not credible.

On July 14, citing two senior administration officials, syndicated columnist Robert Novak revealed that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA and said that she had suggested sending him to Niger.

Wilson denies his wife had anything to do with his trip to Niger. "The CIA had spoken to me on any number of occasions on African-related issues. This was not unusual," he said.

Tracing the Path

On Aug. 21, at a public forum in Seattle, Wilson suggested that it was Rove, Bush's chief political strategist, who revealed his wife's identity. He later backtracked, saying he had no knowledge that it was Rove who personally leaked the information, but that he believed the White House adviser condoned the leak and did nothing to shut it down.

Wilson maintains that Washington reporters told him they spoke with Rove on the telephone after the Novak column came out.

"What I have confidence in — based upon what respectable press people in this town have told me — is that a week after the Novak article came out, Karl Rove was still calling around and talking to press people, saying Wilson's wife is fair game," Wilson said.

"The gist of the message, as it was reported back to me right after the phone call, was 'I just got off the phone with Karl Rove. He tells me your wife is fair game.' "

The White House has said it is "ridiculous" to suggest Rove played any role in disclosing the identity of Wilson's wife, and Bush on Tuesday said he welcomed the Justice Department investigation into the leak.

On Tuesday, all White House employees received a message from the White House Counsel's office asking them to preserve all documents from Feb. 1, 2002, to the present that related to the Justice Department probe.

In the National, Not Party, Interest

Wilson is expected to meet with members of the House Democratic Caucus today, but he denies he is doing it out of partisanship. Democratic lawmakers have called for the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate the leak.

"I'm meeting with the Democratic Caucus because they invited me," he said. "If the Republican Caucus were to invite me, I would go up and meet with them as well."

Wilson said he would be asked about his views on Bush's $87 billion budget request for reconstructing Iraq and Afghanistan, but said he expected to be asked about the investigation as well.

Wilson said he believed his views concerning the way ahead are "nonpartisan, are the best way ahead for our country — not for one political party or another."

The investigation concerning his wife should not be viewed as a partisan matter either, he said. "We're talking about a crime against the national security of the United States. That is not a partisan activity. That is a crime against the country."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ambassador; fairgame; josephwilson; plamenameblamegame; press; valerieplame; whitehouse; wife; wilson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
The ambassador, Joseph Wilson, said he plans to give the names of the reporters to the FBI, which is conducting a full-blown investigation of the possible leak.

"I will be revealing the names of everybody who called me and cited White House sources or cited people specifically," Wilson said in an interview with Nightline's Ted Koppel.

1 posted on 10/01/2003 12:31:58 PM PDT by prairiebreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Still waiting for the names.
2 posted on 10/01/2003 12:32:53 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
The most damning statements against Karl Rove I've read yet.

??

Prairie
3 posted on 10/01/2003 12:33:37 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (My dad, a WWII veteran always said that America's best ally was...Britain. He was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Oct. 1— The former ambassador who accused the White House of leaking the identity of his CIA officer wife to the press says Washington reporters told him that senior White House adviser Karl Rove said his wife was "fair game."

Why should we believe anything that Wilson says? He's already admitting to lying that he had proof that Rove orchestrated the leak.

You will see this one passed back and forth in the press and then dropped, just as the Washington ComPost altered their story that ran Sunday, changing the level of the unnamed source.

4 posted on 10/01/2003 12:34:17 PM PDT by dirtboy (CongressmanBillyBob/John Armor for Congress - you can't separate them, so send 'em both to D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Are you with the Bureau?
5 posted on 10/01/2003 12:35:01 PM PDT by lugsoul (And I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
The most damning statements against Karl Rove I've read yet.

See my post #4 - consider the source. This will probably be bandied about and then downplayed later.

6 posted on 10/01/2003 12:35:29 PM PDT by dirtboy (CongressmanBillyBob/John Armor for Congress - you can't separate them, so send 'em both to D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Timesink





FYI


7 posted on 10/01/2003 12:35:52 PM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
He went public with this and now he wants to pull back when it comes time to produce the evidence.
8 posted on 10/01/2003 12:35:58 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Are you with the Bureau?

Nah, just waiting for something other than unnamed sources or unnamed reports to put some hard information out. Wilson has already admitted both lying and having a political agenda - he is hardly a reliable source to date.

9 posted on 10/01/2003 12:36:34 PM PDT by dirtboy (CongressmanBillyBob/John Armor for Congress - you can't separate them, so send 'em both to D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Rove is more the target here than W, IMHO...
10 posted on 10/01/2003 12:38:03 PM PDT by eureka! (Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Once Novak has already published her name, why would she not be fair game?
11 posted on 10/01/2003 12:38:18 PM PDT by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
This is getting more and more obsurd. Didn't he just backoff his previous statements about Rove's involvement (or lack of) in this mess? I'm so confused. Could someone post a minute by minute timeline of this?!
12 posted on 10/01/2003 12:39:42 PM PDT by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I must've misread the article. I thought it said he was going to give the names to the FBI.

Wait. That is what it said.

Why publish them, when all that does is allow everyone to run for cover and craft a response?

13 posted on 10/01/2003 12:39:58 PM PDT by lugsoul (And I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Wilson maintains that Washington reporters told him they spoke with Rove on the telephone after the Novak column came out.

Even if true, and its a BIG 'if' considering Wilson's lies to date, after Novak's column came out Wilson's wife was fair game.

14 posted on 10/01/2003 12:40:03 PM PDT by Grit (Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
""I will be revealing the names of everybody "

Is there a specific reason why the reporters and democrats aren't falling all over themselves to call this "McCarthyesque?"

15 posted on 10/01/2003 12:40:05 PM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
Rove is more the target here than W, IMHO...

There's no question. Rove is OBVIOUSLY the target.

16 posted on 10/01/2003 12:40:58 PM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Why make a big deal of it publically THEN not release the evidence to the public? How do we know he is going to turn anything over to the FBI? What evidence does he have? It sounds to me like he is ducking for cover now that his hand is called.
17 posted on 10/01/2003 12:42:46 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
I'm waiting for the inevitable updates:

1) "I guess the term used was not actually 'fair game', I suppose I got carried away when I indicated that term was used"
2) "I guess it wasn't Karl Rove who told me this, it was in fact a reporter for the Washington Post who gave me this information. But I have no doubt that Rove was involved.

18 posted on 10/01/2003 12:43:11 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
I smell McCauliffe.........
19 posted on 10/01/2003 12:43:45 PM PDT by b4its2late (Warning: Dates in Calendar are closer than they appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
"...he plans to give the names of the reporters to the FBI..."

They will take the 1st! Besides, it was probably CARL Rove, not KARL Rove - or some other demonrat BS!

20 posted on 10/01/2003 12:44:52 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (The barbarians are inside the gates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson