Skip to comments.
NFL Team Can Keep 'Redskins' Trademark
Yahoo! News (AP) ^
| 10/1/2003
| Sam Hananel
Posted on 10/01/2003 10:16:03 AM PDT by Pyro7480
NFL Team Can Keep 'Redskins' Trademark
By SAM HANANEL, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - A federal judge has overturned a ruling revoking the Washington Redskins trademark, finding there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the name is disparaging to American Indians.
U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued the ruling in connection with a 1999 decision by a panel of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. But she also made clear that her ruling does not address the issue of whether the name "Redskins" actually is offensive to Indians.
Redskins spokesman Karl Swanson said the team hadn't reviewed the entire ruling but "from what we've been told by our attorneys, we are pleased."
If the team lost, it could have been stripped of the exclusive rights to market the Redskins name.
The lawsuit began in 1992 when seven American Indians, led by Suzan Shown Harjo, asked the trademark office to cancel six trademarks containing the word "Redskin." In 1999, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board granted a petition to cancel the team's trademark registrations because of a federal law, the Lanham Act, prohibiting registering "disparaging" names.
In her 84-page decision, issued late Tuesday, Kollar-Kotelly also found that the plaintiffs waited too long to make their claims under the law, which was in effect when the Redskins trademarks were registered in 1967.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: courts; lanhamact; nfl; racism; redskins; trademark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
A little sanity returns to the courts!
1
posted on
10/01/2003 10:16:04 AM PDT
by
Pyro7480
To: Pyro7480
Interesting. I still believe it is a disparaging mascot, but the courts have spoken. back to work....
2
posted on
10/01/2003 10:18:46 AM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.)
To: Pyro7480
Weren't they the Duluth Eskimos at one time?
3
posted on
10/01/2003 10:19:32 AM PDT
by
akorahil
To: Pyro7480
I understand the argument, but it's not meant to demoralize people. It's actually meant to praise them.
4
posted on
10/01/2003 10:19:54 AM PDT
by
rs79bm
To: Lunatic Fringe
I believe Redskins were the ones that helped name them "Redskins" in the first place!
5
posted on
10/01/2003 10:20:08 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all!!!)
To: ConservativeMan55
Somebody send this to Rush!
6
posted on
10/01/2003 10:20:42 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all!!!)
To: Pyro7480
At least they don't call themselves the "Washington Savages," or the "Washington Firewater Drinkers."
7
posted on
10/01/2003 10:21:04 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: Pyro7480
yay! thank God for that too, otherwse the Fighting Irish would be sued by Irish people, and the Falcons would be sued by birdwatchers!
8
posted on
10/01/2003 10:21:29 AM PDT
by
MacDorcha
To: Pyro7480
Actually, I have always believed that the name was disparaging as well as the Canucks.
When the Redskins were formed in Boston, there were similar sentiments conveyed when they chose that as their name.
9
posted on
10/01/2003 10:21:58 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
To: Pyro7480
Washington Redksins BUMP!!
10
posted on
10/01/2003 10:22:22 AM PDT
by
jgrubbs
To: Pyro7480
This has much more to do with economic and political clout than it does with justice. "Redskin" is racist in any context.
11
posted on
10/01/2003 10:23:09 AM PDT
by
Kleon
(To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle.)
To: Pyro7480
Well, while I personally find the term "redskin" as offensive as if someone called blacks "BlackSkins", or asians "YellowSkins", I never could see the point of making a federal case out of it...
12
posted on
10/01/2003 10:23:59 AM PDT
by
Chad Fairbanks
(<Tag>Something unspeakably clever</Tag>)
To: Kleon
so is "cracker" and "nigger" but many minorities excercise those words with impunity.
To: MacDorcha
And if they created a professional team named after one of those slurs, I would expect the court to thry and block them.
14
posted on
10/01/2003 10:26:57 AM PDT
by
Kleon
(To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle.)
To: Pyro7480
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
found the litigant's case to be smelly
so Washington wins
sing "Hail to the Redskins"
And go put some beer in your belly
15
posted on
10/01/2003 10:27:52 AM PDT
by
ko_kyi
To: jgrubbs
Spurrier sucks. :)P
16
posted on
10/01/2003 10:27:58 AM PDT
by
TheBigB
("Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." --P.J. O'Rourke)
To: Pyro7480
I'd imagine that the court's ruling would've been different if the team in question were named the "Yellowskins" or the "Blackskins."
17
posted on
10/01/2003 10:30:16 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Pyro7480
It would have been a pity if we lost the Redskins fight song.
"Hail to the Chestnut Shirts" would not have worked.
To: MacDorcha
A group of Native American and non-Indian students of the University of Northern Colorado came up with the "Fighting Whites" to deliver a simple, sincere, message about ethnic stereotyping. I'm white, and I don't find it offensive.
19
posted on
10/01/2003 10:31:11 AM PDT
by
jgrubbs
To: Pyro7480
These are the two most popular jackets worn by
Indians on the Flathead Indian Reservation where I am employed.
>
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson