To: MacDorcha
And if they created a professional team named after one of those slurs, I would expect the court to thry and block them.
14 posted on
10/01/2003 10:26:57 AM PDT by
Kleon
(To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle.)
To: Kleon
And if they created a professional team named after one of those slurs, I would expect the court to thry and block them. Atlanta never had a problem with this one.
57 posted on
10/01/2003 11:14:38 AM PDT by
Leroy S. Mort
(No guts..No glory)
To: Kleon
And if they created a professional team named after one of those slurs, I would expect the court to thry and block them.
Although I think you're right about the blocking attempt, I can't think of anything in the Constitution that gives federal courts the authority to attempt such a blockage. Can you? The judiciary is supposed to interpret laws, not dictate acceptable behavior and sports names.
69 posted on
10/01/2003 11:43:31 AM PDT by
fr_freak
To: Kleon
they already have the "fighting irish", pretty close if you ask me.
the point is that this lawsuit was only used to get money, and not for any actual moral reason. such is the case for many likewise cases in the courts.
To: Kleon
and by the way, "indian" is supposedly a slur to sensitive types, but is still not only in common use, but accepted by the native american community to refer to them as a group. redskin is no more a slur than indian.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson