None of my statements were socialist. I've offered no support for any type of federal action whatsoever. You support the use of Hb-1 workers which is only possible if the federal government grants companies permission to do so and then you claim that telling the federal government to quit is socialist.
You are willing to trade 100 manufacturing jobs for 200 jobs as a stockman at wal-mart? Where is the benefit to capitalism in that? Are automakers better off for selling 200 Escorts rather than 100 Cadillacs?
After calling me a socialist you still haven't made one statement on the role of a capitalist employee. I don't think you grasp the concept and until you do you will continue to be dismissed by the socialist who think you represent everything evil about capitalist and the true capitalist who think you are giving them a bad name.
As for your last point, I'm not sure that selling all of our business interests to the Chinese is a basic principle of capitalism either
OK, fine... we both are against federal government intervention. So here's the deal: we end the H1-B program completely and let anyone from India who would like to move here to do so. No restrictions on businesses, no federal government telling Americans who they can and can't hire, no federal H1-B programs. Would that be OK with you?
What in the world does this mean? Is there some difference in an employee willing to do a job for $20,000 and one who won't do the same job for less than $50,000? What does it matter who is doing the job? "Capitalist employees" and "Capitalist owners" are just stupid terms you've created to excuse what you support here: federal restrictions on who businesses can hire to work for them.