===
If you don't cease and desist, and stop harassing me, I am going to ask the Terminator to squash this annoying bug.
PS. Stop referring to me as a "she", pretending that you know my gender.
Posted on 09/30/2003 9:57:29 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Imagine if the Democrats won an election with a candidate who made vague liberal sounds from time to time, but decried abortion, viewed the homosexual agenda as a cultural menace, supported tax cuts and limited government, rejected affirmative action, called the Greens "left-wing crazies," consulted with Michael Reagan regularly, and had once given money to Alan Keyes. Would rank-and-file Democrats consider that win a real victory? No, they would seethe with rage. "Our leaders just handed the conservatives a victory," they'd say.
Arnold Schwarzenegger is the Republican equivalent of this scenario. He is a de facto Democrat and Hollywood liberal. Should he win, state Republican leaders will have engineered a victory not for rank-and-file Republicans but for the liberal establishment.
Liberals of varying gradations now head both parties in the state. No longer even recognizably Republican (judging by the party's platform), the state party executive board offered an "unprecedented" endorsement of Schwarzenegger. Martha House, vice chairwoman of the board, explained the vote by saying: "Contrary to popular belief, we do want to win."
Translation: Since we lack the conviction and courage to beat the Democrats on principle, we will join them and endorse a de facto Democrat. An ordinary Republican, hearing House's comment, can reasonably conclude that the party stands for nothing except winning. In which case, why does the state Republican party exist at all? Why doesn't it just merge with the California Democrats? Then it could win every election.
Political parties exist not to win willy-nilly but to win on their principles. Victory is not the end, but the means to the end, which is the enactment of the party's platform. If substanceless winning were the purpose of political parties, platform documents would be blank.
California Republican leaders have turned the means into the end, and thereby turned the party over to liberals. Their talk of a Republican rebirth is laughable -- unless they mean that the party is being reborn as a sister party to the Democratic one.
A party that seeks victory for the sake of its principles can renew itself. But a party that abandons its principles for the sake of victory is hopelessly lost. One longtime California GOP activist, who has watched the party progressively lose its "brain and spine," likens the liberalization of the state party to the "Stockholm syndrome." California Republican leaders identify with their liberal captors while they view with hostility Republican rescuers like Tom McClintock.
Like robots programmed by the Los Angeles Times, state Republican leaders said repeatedly that a real Republican "can't win." They parroted this yearly liberal prophecy, treated it as fact, then made it fact by torpedoing McClintock so that he couldn't win.
The problem with the Republican elite is much deeper than confusion. They didn't accidentally swallow a liberal lie; they fervently believe it. The "McClintock can't win" line was bogus from the start. The recent USA Today poll shows that McClintock would win easily in a race against Cruz Bustamante. What the Republicans were really saying was not that McClintock can't win but that he shouldn't win. "McClintock scares the hell out of the Republican establishment, because he represents fundamental change and they don't want that," said the GOP activist. "When Tom had a good chance of winning last year in the Controller's race, they didn't lift a finger to help him."
The Richard Riordans and Gerry Parskys of the party call on conservatives to "be team players," though liberal Republicans rarely behave like team players when conservatives are running. McClintock will "pay a price" for remaining in the race, Republican leaders warn. What price will they pay for gutting the party of its principles?
If Schwarzenegger wins and governs like a Kennedy liberal -- a good bet -- McClintock could reemerge as his Republican primary opponent in 2006. The rank-and-file, disgusted with a Republican establishment that has given birth to yet another Jim Jeffords/Arlen Specter, will not care one whit that the establishment has scorned McClintock. If anything, respect for McClintock will grow as it becomes clear that his hardheaded fiscal conservatism is the only authentic answer to the crisis.
Recall that Ron Unz, the Republican who challenged Governor Pete Wilson in 1994, got 34 percent of the primary vote. I asked Unz recently if he would have done better had he gone into the primary with the national attention McClintock now enjoys. "There is no doubt about that," he said. Unz doesn't count McClintock out, especially if a Schwarzenegger administration is as "disastrous as it might be."
George Neumayr is The American Spectator's managing editor.
;-)
This is my favorite part of the article. Calls it so accurately.
After hearing Shiver speak today, it was almost like a new George Orwell book. THe thread was a keeper.
"If Republicans fail to defeat Gov. Gray Davis, "They will be done in California for a decade," said former GOP national pollster Frank Luntz, cementing for Democrats the nation's biggest cache of electoral college votes for future presidential elections. "You would not just lose activists, you would lose donors, you would lose any interest in politics, if the recall fails," Luntz said.
But if Schwarzenegger wins, he said, "California is back in play for 2004."
Schwarzenegger's star power would be a huge asset for the GOP, party activists say, pointing to Rep. Sonny Bono, who when he was alive, proved one of the GOP's biggest fund-raisers, because people loved seeing a celebrity.
Funny, I remember the Republicans being against the recall to begin with - now you are saying they went to the trouble of having it?
Simon will go done in history as running one of the most botched campaigns ever - wonder who he has to thank?
If McClintock and Bustamante were the only ones in the recall, we'd be looking at a new conservative governor - especially if McClintock got the support of his party. But if wishes were fishes, we'd all cast nets.
As far as your failure comment - ask Pyrrhus (279 B.C.)what he thinks about that. Or your constituency that is leaving the party.
Oooooooo!! VERY good question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hb
===
If you don't cease and desist, and stop harassing me, I am going to ask the Terminator to squash this annoying bug.
PS. Stop referring to me as a "she", pretending that you know my gender.
;-)
The Teminator doesn't impress or scare me!!! :-)
C'mon FO, I'm not harassing you! I haven't called you a bad name, flamed you, or done anything but ask you some difficult questions for you (one unanswered is here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/994651/posts?page=28#28). To accuse me of harassment is disingenious at the least. Claiming harassment when faced with difficult questions sounds more like you're a liberal than a conservative to me.
PS. Stop referring to me as a "she", pretending that you know my gender.
Am I wrong? I don't want to have to refer to you as "it" in posts. :-)
Hb
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.