To: Brian S
Translation: We want to be free to tear down the Bush Administration, without being questioned about silly little things like proof and stuff. SPeculation rumour, and anonymous sources are much more efficient...
3 posted on
09/30/2003 5:43:31 PM PDT by
Chad Fairbanks
(I like my women like I like my coffee - Hot, and in a big cup)
To: Chad Fairbanks
BINGO! With rules like this, the media can make up any claim they want and never have to reveal their sources. Deepthroat.
4 posted on
09/30/2003 5:45:16 PM PDT by
cwb
To: Chad Fairbanks; William McKinley
Let me get this straight.
At first they want to lynch Rove and GW for leaking.
Now that GW has called for an investigation re who really did the leaking, they are against it.
If the left wing American Media just disappeared tonight at Midnight, the entire world would be better off.
7 posted on
09/30/2003 5:48:31 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Actually, if he reveals the source it will take away the ammo against Bush. That's why they are fighting it.
To: Chad Fairbanks
Translation: We want to be free to tear down the Bush Administration, without being questioned about silly little things like proof and stuff. SPeculation rumour, and anonymous sources are much more efficient... Bingo.
69 posted on
09/30/2003 6:39:22 PM PDT by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: Chad Fairbanks
Bingo!!
They want an investigation - just as long as they are not included. This time the media has stepped in it up to their neck. If they resist the subpeona - we'll know who they are. They think it's so great to give the democrats an avenue to vent their vile garbage - this is what they deserve.
I want to know who the 6 reporters were who talked to Wilson.
124 posted on
09/30/2003 11:30:59 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
(America - The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson