Posted on 09/30/2003 11:24:00 AM PDT by Bob J
"Mission Creep "
By Gary Aldrich
The Department of Justice has decided to move the investigation to the F.B.I., and Customs officials are hopping mad about it. Some critics are calling the move a blatant power grab by the F.B.I.
I disagree. From the time the FBI was formed, J. Edgar Hoover made it policy to hire Attorneys and Accountants before any other disciplines were considered. The FBI has the most qualified, most educated financial investigators of any federal agency and they have years of experience of highly complex cases under their belts.
Meanwhile, down at the Alcohol, Tobacco Tax, and Firearms agency, or ATF as it is commonly referred, bureaucrats are getting the bad news that the FBI will also become the lead agency to handle domestic bombings. Here too, critics of the FBI rush to defend the ATF, an agency that in recent years has suffered from its own scandals and serious shortcomings.
Yet choosing the FBI for this important task makes perfect sense. The FBI has emerged as the lead agency on the war on terrorism. Why should they show up at a bombing crime scene and play second fiddle to another law enforcement agency that is waiting to see if Middle Eastern terrorists are behind the bombing?
Change always comes hard to federal agencies. You would think agency management would be happy when they have fewer violations to investigate. Sadly, it is the nature of bureaucracy to seek new missions, even as they complain that they lack the resources to handle the ones they already have.
But what about these increased responsibilities for the FBI at a time when they too have more on their plates than they seem able to handle? It is a fair question. Over the years, the FBI has accumulated more odds and ends federal violations than you can imagine.
Either the FBI seeks new powers to complement the ones they already have, or they have them assigned by a Congress that can turn every molehill into a mountain given enough special interest pressures. At some point, the agency gets too large to manage.
Customs, ATF, Secret Service, IRS, and Treasury agents should enjoy this reprieve as the very unusual positive change that it is. They can now investigate the core violations they were supposed to handle when they were first established.
But somebody in authority should take a look at what the FBI has as its responsibility – it’s too large and complex for any one agency to effectively and efficiently deal with. Perhaps this is a good time for the FBI to get rid of some of the nonsense violations taking up so much of its time and energy.
Two examples are car theft and bank embezzlements. Perhaps Treasury agents could get some of those bank embezzlement cases, while Customs can track some of those stolen vehicles that are being shipped overseas. We don’t need FBI agents working on minor federal violations when there are terrorists to investigate and arrest.
Mission creep plagues every federal agency and eventually handicaps law enforcement. Federal agencies that lose a few violations for whatever reason should be grateful – not jealous. Agency reforms and realignments have been needed for a long time. A terrorist attack is what it took to jump-start the process.
But while we load up the FBI with real important work, lets help them by taking away some of the lesser violations that have nothing to do with the FBI’s core mission.
Gary Aldrich is president and founder of The Patrick Henry Center for Individual Liberty, a TownHall.com member group.
©2003 Gary W. Aldrich. Reprinted with permission.
Return the FBI to a purely "investigative" agency.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation needs to concentrate it's efforts on just that.. Investigation.
Office politics can and does get in the way of investigation and enforcement duties, and can influence the outcome of an investigation, leading to "enforcement" on the wrong parties, or "evidence" that has been compromised by political expediency.
Likewise, BATFE needs to concentrate on tax collection and making sure proper forms are provided, completed, as well as inspections.
As stated in the article, BATFE has had quite a history of scandals and most of those are in the area of enforcement.
Therefore, to reduce the problem, transfer the enforcement responsibility out of the BATFE and to another agency.
If there MUST be a federal law enforcement agency, let it be ONE AGENCY.
I suggest the U.S. Marshall's office, which would be responsible for all "armed enforcement actions".
All other agencies responsible for armed enforcement activities would become subordinate agencies of the U.S. Marshall's service, consolidating a myriad of rules and regulations to one federal standard, and reducing the chain of commmand, and chain of responsibility to one single heirarchy.
Then, we can get rid of the Homeland Security Office.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.