Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_1981
Because, because, because, he has no credibility unless he reveals the source.

Then why does anybody ever have any credibility talking about anonymous sources?

41 posted on 09/30/2003 10:12:10 AM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: MattAMiller
Then why does anybody ever have any credibility talking about anonymous sources?

The normal rules of credibility shift when a reporter's story becomes a political issue. Novak triggered this investigation by his column. He cannot take his match back and undo the fire he started. The only think he can do is tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. He is not doing that so he has no credibility to limit the damage in the fire he started.

44 posted on 09/30/2003 10:19:51 AM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson