Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Would Jesus Tax?
Break Point ^ | September 29, 2003 | Leslie Carbone

Posted on 09/30/2003 7:58:18 AM PDT by EsclavoDeCristo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
"What Would Jesus Tax?" I wonder if this is the same guy who started the campain against SUV's "What Would Jesus Drive?"
1 posted on 09/30/2003 7:58:18 AM PDT by EsclavoDeCristo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
What Would Scooby Do?
2 posted on 09/30/2003 7:59:23 AM PDT by lunatic12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
I always like the bumper sticker:

If 10% is good enough for God, it is good enough for the government

3 posted on 09/30/2003 8:00:35 AM PDT by mattdono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
I was always under the impression that jesus hated big government.
4 posted on 09/30/2003 8:00:56 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lunatic12
Really, makes as much sense.
5 posted on 09/30/2003 8:02:24 AM PDT by Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
The "good" Gov. and me disagree on a few things here. Jesus wanted us to give freely to those in need, not have the govt. take it from us and redistribute it to whom the deem needs it. Big difference.
6 posted on 09/30/2003 8:04:13 AM PDT by Blue Scourge ("If a man hasn't found something he is willing to die for he is not fit to live"- M. Luther King Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
He would tax nothing! (See the tax collecters he overturned their tables for)

He would allow private citizens to care for each other.

If charity is a religeous act and there is supposedly a seperation of church and state, then shouldn't charity be eliminated from the government functions?
7 posted on 09/30/2003 8:05:28 AM PDT by CSM (www.banallfun.com - Homepage of all Smoke Gnatzies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono
Where did you get 10%?? Way too much.
8 posted on 09/30/2003 8:09:24 AM PDT by Norse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Norse
Well, I agree too, but that was what the bumper sticker said.

Frankly, if 10% was my total tax burden (federal, state, local, etc.), I think I might be alright with that. It would be a heck of alot better than the % I am paying now.

9 posted on 09/30/2003 8:13:12 AM PDT by mattdono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
Jesus wouldn't have taxed anything or even concerned himself about the issue.

He left government to the governors and was concerned about men's souls.
10 posted on 09/30/2003 8:21:02 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
"It is immoral to charge somebody making $5,000 a year an income tax."

Fine.
Now that we have established that taxing income is immoral, everything else is simply a matter of degree!

11 posted on 09/30/2003 8:42:09 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lunatic12
Where would Tom Cruise?
12 posted on 09/30/2003 8:45:59 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Far out, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lunatic12
What would Jimmy Reed?
13 posted on 09/30/2003 8:47:13 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Far out, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lunatic12
What would Emily Post?
14 posted on 09/30/2003 8:48:02 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Far out, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CSM
he overturned the money changers' tables. (private businessmen who changed foreign currencies so pilgrims could purchase sacrificial animals). he ate with tax collectors (despised by the Jews as traitors working for the occupying Romans).

Mrs VS

15 posted on 09/30/2003 9:11:24 AM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EsclavoDeCristo

"It is immoral to charge somebody making $5,000 a year an income tax."

Now that we have established that, why an income tax at all?

Thomas Hobbes from Leviathan

The Primary Intent of the individual income tax is for political and social control not revenue collection. The Individual Income tax is maintained to establish and hold every person in the country perpetual legal jeopardy. That is a situation that must end with the repeal of the income tax from the statutes, and the prohibition of its use by Constitutional amendment that future generations will not face the same manner of manipulation and interference in their lives.

There was good reason why Karl Marx and the Communist Party made the progressive/graduated income tax the 2nd plank of the Manifesto of the Communist Party, by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, published in 1848. We should never forget nor overlook the philosophical underpinnings of that choice:

"The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state ... . Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property ... . These measures will, of course, be different in different countries. Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in he hands of the state.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. "


16 posted on 09/30/2003 10:06:31 AM PDT by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Who Would Sylvia Plath?
17 posted on 09/30/2003 10:08:48 AM PDT by paulklenk (DEPORT HILLARY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
What would Emanuel Ax?
18 posted on 09/30/2003 10:22:28 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Far out, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
From Whence Gennifer Flowers?
19 posted on 09/30/2003 10:23:40 AM PDT by paulklenk (DEPORT HILLARY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
Why would Billy Joe Shaver?
20 posted on 09/30/2003 11:07:05 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Far out, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson