Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"What Would Jesus Tax?" I wonder if this is the same guy who started the campain against SUV's "What Would Jesus Drive?"
1 posted on 09/30/2003 7:58:18 AM PDT by EsclavoDeCristo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EsclavoDeCristo
What Would Scooby Do?
2 posted on 09/30/2003 7:59:23 AM PDT by lunatic12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
I always like the bumper sticker:

If 10% is good enough for God, it is good enough for the government

3 posted on 09/30/2003 8:00:35 AM PDT by mattdono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
I was always under the impression that jesus hated big government.
4 posted on 09/30/2003 8:00:56 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
The "good" Gov. and me disagree on a few things here. Jesus wanted us to give freely to those in need, not have the govt. take it from us and redistribute it to whom the deem needs it. Big difference.
6 posted on 09/30/2003 8:04:13 AM PDT by Blue Scourge ("If a man hasn't found something he is willing to die for he is not fit to live"- M. Luther King Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
He would tax nothing! (See the tax collecters he overturned their tables for)

He would allow private citizens to care for each other.

If charity is a religeous act and there is supposedly a seperation of church and state, then shouldn't charity be eliminated from the government functions?
7 posted on 09/30/2003 8:05:28 AM PDT by CSM (www.banallfun.com - Homepage of all Smoke Gnatzies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
Jesus wouldn't have taxed anything or even concerned himself about the issue.

He left government to the governors and was concerned about men's souls.
10 posted on 09/30/2003 8:21:02 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EsclavoDeCristo
"It is immoral to charge somebody making $5,000 a year an income tax."

Fine.
Now that we have established that taxing income is immoral, everything else is simply a matter of degree!

11 posted on 09/30/2003 8:42:09 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EsclavoDeCristo

"It is immoral to charge somebody making $5,000 a year an income tax."

Now that we have established that, why an income tax at all?

Thomas Hobbes from Leviathan

The Primary Intent of the individual income tax is for political and social control not revenue collection. The Individual Income tax is maintained to establish and hold every person in the country perpetual legal jeopardy. That is a situation that must end with the repeal of the income tax from the statutes, and the prohibition of its use by Constitutional amendment that future generations will not face the same manner of manipulation and interference in their lives.

There was good reason why Karl Marx and the Communist Party made the progressive/graduated income tax the 2nd plank of the Manifesto of the Communist Party, by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, published in 1848. We should never forget nor overlook the philosophical underpinnings of that choice:

"The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state ... . Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property ... . These measures will, of course, be different in different countries. Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in he hands of the state.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. "


16 posted on 09/30/2003 10:06:31 AM PDT by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EsclavoDeCristo; ElkGroveDan
No... No... No!!!

This will be the debate question at the next Arnold & Airianna debate show, don'tcha know?

25 posted on 09/30/2003 11:20:00 AM PDT by SierraWasp (I prefer consistent "Considerate Conservatives," to "Compassionate Conservatives," everytime !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson