[Luis Gonzalez]

There's nothing wrong with the law signed by Bush, it requires a verification of identity other than the voter's registration prior to voting. There's a whole lot wrong with issuing legal driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, which is something you would normally be wailing about, bit the opportunity to side with the left in a bit of Bush bashing was just too tempting to pass up.

But, don't let the facts get in the way of your need to bash Bush...and BTW, if you spend your day listening to Dean, Kerry, Clark, and the rest, you'll pick up lots and lots of talking points to use.

[KC_for_Freedom]

it requires a verification of identity other than the voter's registration prior to voting.

In California, the requirement to verify identity is handled by having the prospective voter sign his/her name. There is not other verification, all you need do is register. Actually showing proof of identity is a good idea. (Now should illegals be given such proof?) Well, taking their fingerprints and names and getting them registered will make it hard for them to vote more than onec, and may lead to their being easier to locate? The new California law may not net very many applicants as the illegals tend to avoid such things as leaving a fingerprint.

[4Freedom]

"...requires a verification of identity..."

Sure it does, but with ID that is easy to get thanks to the continued pandering of Liberal Democrats and RINOs and misguided laws like this.

Or does this mean that Luis Gonzalez is on record as saying that no illegal aliens will be voting in future elections?